Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s under the influence of drugs or narcotics or alcohol at the time of observation of events in dispute or at the time the witness is testifying. As Wigmore points out, however, a general habit of intemperance tells us nothing of the witness's testimonial incapacity unless it involves actual intoxication
). In particular, not every expert admissible under Daubert need rely on a method that conforms with "the exactness of hard science methodologies." E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P., No. 07-CV-8383 (LAP), 2010 WL 3466370, at *13-14 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2010) (quoting United States v. Simmons, 470 F.3d 1115, 1123 (5th Cir. 2006)).
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s under the influence of drugs or narcotics or alcohol at the time of observation of events in dispute or at the time the witness is testifying. As Wigmore points out, however, a general habit of intemperance tells us nothing of the witness's testimonial incapacity unless it involves actual intoxication
). In particular, not every expert admissible under Daubert need rely on a method that conforms with "the exactness of hard science methodologies." E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P., No. 07-CV-8383 (LAP), 2010 WL 3466370, at *13-14 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2010) (quoting United States v. Simmons, 470 F.3d 1115, 1123 (5th Cir. 2006)).
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s under the influence of drugs or narcotics or alcohol at the time of observation of events in dispute or at the time the witness is testifying. As Wigmore points out, however, a general habit of intemperance tells us nothing of the witness's testimonial incapacity unless it involves actual intoxication
). In particular, not every expert admissible under Daubert need rely on a method that conforms with "the exactness of hard science methodologies." E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P., No. 07-CV-8383 (LAP), 2010 WL 3466370, at *13-14 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2010) (quoting United States v. Simmons, 470 F.3d 1115, 1123 (5th Cir. 2006)).
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (49)
Entities connected to both Wigmore and E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Wigmore·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
United States
LOCATION7 w/ Wigmore·6 w/ E.E.O.C.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON5 w/ Wigmore·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON5 w/ Wigmore·6 w/ E.E.O.C.
Bloomberg L.P.
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Wigmore·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON3 w/ Wigmore·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
DA
Daubert
PERSON3 w/ Wigmore·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
LR
Lisa Rocchio
PERSON3 w/ Wigmore·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
ALISON J. NATHAN
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Wigmore·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
Russell Simmons
PERSON3 w/ Wigmore·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
Alto v. Sun Pharm
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Wigmore·6 w/ E.E.O.C.
USDC SONY
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Wigmore·6 w/ E.E.O.C.
HR
Haley Robson
PERSON5 w/ Wigmore·3 w/ E.E.O.C.
Ryan Hall
PERSON3 w/ Wigmore·4 w/ E.E.O.C.
PD
Park Dietz
PERSON3 w/ Wigmore·4 w/ E.E.O.C.
EL
Elizabeth Loftus
PERSON3 w/ Wigmore·4 w/ E.E.O.C.
Paul Ryan
PERSON3 w/ Wigmore·4 w/ E.E.O.C.
LO
Loftus
PERSON3 w/ Wigmore·4 w/ E.E.O.C.
DI
Dietz
PERSON3 w/ Wigmore·4 w/ E.E.O.C.
Valle
PERSON3 w/ Wigmore·4 w/ E.E.O.C.