Epstein Secrets

nal Defense Lawyers, Washington, Michael Price, Brennan Center for Justice, New York, NY; Hanni M. Fakho

ms officials, rather than upon constitutional requirements applied to the inapposite context of this son of search." Id. at 507 (emphasis added). The Third Circuit similarly rejected a reasonable suspicion requirement for border searches of electronic data, albeit in an unpublished opinion. See United States

of with respect to obscenity was j ot beyond a reasonable doubt McKinney Alabama, 424 U.S. 609, 684, 98 S.Ct. 11 , 1197, 47 L.Ed.241 887 (1976) (Brennan, J., concurring in the judg- ment). It is reasonable to assume that the trial judge applied these standards in his own fact findings. Finally, I c

request a sampling of voting records can hardly be EFTA00191853 806 770 FEDERAL REPORTER, 2d SERIES described as a purely administrative act. The Third Circuit has highlighted this as- pect of a prosecutor's duties: We recognize that the decision of the Attorney General, or a prosecuting attor- ney, to ini

old State Courts Accountable, 9 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 647 (2005). 348 Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589, 598-99 (1977). In his Whalen concurrence, Justice Brennan asserted that if a statute allowed indiscriminate disclosure of personal medical records, "such a deprivation [of privacy] would only be consistent w

identify victim impact information as a possible basis for an upward departure and the government conceded that a sentencing remand was appropriate. The Third Circuit has expressly declined to follow Dozier. In United States v. Vampire Nation, +78 the Third Circuit held that, in light of the Supreme Court's 429 4

mmunity that is, by now, not at all the same 'as is enjoyed by foreign gov- ernments, but substantially broader." Ibid. Judge Pillard also noted that the Third Circuit had expressly declined to follow the D. C. Circuit's approach. See OSS Nokalva, Inc. v. European Space Agency, 617 F. 3d 756 (CA3 2010). We granted c

k-product privilege as it exists when the statute is applied. FTC v. Grolier Inc., 462 U. S. 19, 20, 26-27 (1983) (emphasis added); id., at 34, n. 6 (Brennan, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment). Likewise, a general reference to federal dis- covery rules incorporates those rules "as they are