Epstein Secrets

mage Trump. Fox News (07/03, Stancy) reported that the White House is calling for former Obama-era intelligence officials, including ex-CIA Director John Brennan, to be held accountable for their role in promoting allegations about Trump's ties to Russia during the 2016 election. Press Secretary Karoline Lea

ted from intelligence standards by including the Steele dossier, undermining the report's credibility. The review found that CIA analysts had warned Brennan against using the dossier, citing tradecraft violations, but Brennan allegedly prioritized "narrative consistency" over analytical rigor. The inter

ch), The Guardian (07/06, Holthaus), The Hill (07/06, Suter), Los Angeles Times (07/06, Smith), NBC News (07/06, Bush), New York Post (07/06, Nesi, Oliveira), the New York Times (07/05, Flavelle), Newsweek (07/06, Adeosun), NPR (07/06, Duster), Time (07/06, Schneid), USA Today (07/06, Jervis), the Washin

each case, including those of businessman Paul Whelan and journalist Evan Gershkovich, is being considered and pursued separately. CBS News (07/25, Brennan, Cordes), NBC News (07/25, Jester, Siemaszko), New York Times (07/25, Patil, Cooper), CNN (07/25, Hansler), NPR (07/25, Kelemen), USA TODAY (07/25,

News (07/25, Fisher), The Guardian (07/25, Rushe), The Daily Beast (07/25, McDougall), Financial Times (07/25, Miller, Agini), New York Post (07/25, Oliveira), Bloomberg (07/25, Benny-Morrison), Daily Mail (07/25, Keegan), Telegraph (07/25, Stephens), and The Athletic (07/25, Kay-Jelski) also reported on

k-product privilege as it exists when the statute is applied. FTC v. Grolier Inc., 462 U. S. 19, 20, 26-27 (1983) (emphasis added); id., at 34, n. 6 (Brennan, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment). Likewise, a general reference to federal dis- covery rules incorporates those rules "as they are

at there is no single, universally applicable answer to this question. Fairly recent cases from this Court make that clear. Compare New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira, 586 U.S. (2019) (slip op., at 7) (adopting the interpretation of "con- tracts of employment'" that prevailed at the time of the statute's adoption i