Epstein Secrets

cutive, Bank of America U.S. 79 Beth Brooke <http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/11/biz_powerwomen08_Beth-Brooke_PV8I.h tml> Global vice chairman, Ernst & Young U.S. 31 Valentina Matviyenko <http://www.forbes.comilists/2008/11/biz_powerwomen08_Valentina-Matviyen ko_S8DF.html> Governor, St. Petersburg re

58 EFTA00774870 Queen Elizabeth II <http://www.forbes.comilists/2008/11/biz_powerwomen08_Queen-Elizabeth-II _88G5.html> Queen U.K. 96 Queen Rania Al-Abdullah <http://www.forbes.comilists/2008/11/biz_powerwomen08_Queen-Rania-Al-Abd ullahVEPS.html> Queen Jordan 7 Condoleezza Rice <http://www.forbes.co

of production on this issue—resolution of dis- puted issues of fact.’”) (citing Robinson, 269 F.3d at 141); Leutwyler v. Office of Her Majesty Queen Rania Al-Abdullah, 184 F.Supp.2d 277, 287 (S.D.N.Y.2001D (explaining plaintiff may “rebut the pre- sumption of immunity ... by proffering evidence of record that the d

ngly agreed to participate in the [RICO] conspiracy.”). [75,76] Assuming for now that the Plaintiffs have pleaded an _ enterprise, “Tulnder Reves v. Ernst & Young, 507 U.S. 170, 179, 118 S.Ct. 1168, 122 L.Ed.2d 525 (1993), an alleged RICO defendant must have had ‘some part in directing’ the ‘oper- ation or mana

xtrinsic submissions made by the foreign defendants regarding the scope of their official responsibilities.” Leutwyler v. Office of Her Majesty Queen Rania Al-Abdullah, 184 F.Supp.2d 277, 287 (S.D.N.Y.2001). King Faud authorized Dr. Al—Nafissa to make his declaration concerning SHC. (Al-Nafissa Decl. | 2, at Huffma

rom conduct of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity. Sedima, SPRL. v. Imrex Co., Inc., 473 U.S. 479, 491 (1985). P41 In Reves v. Ernst & Young, 507 U.S. 170, 113 S.Ct. 1163, 122 L.Ed.2d 525 (1993), the Supreme Court found that liability under § 1962(c) requires that a defendant be a particip