Epstein Secrets

nternal audit and trace all the K-1's into BRH. The IRS could readily pull this K-1 information from their system. It is very surprising to me that Deloitte nor anyone Apollo knew of these audits. Also, it's interesting that other non- founding executives at Apollo were also recently given assessment not

one internally by IRS. I know that IRS sometimes does examinations internally (client isn't contacted until "internal" audit is concluded).. Because BRH Holdings LP is mainly a holding entity owning many other flow-through partnership entities, IRS could easily trace all K-1's flowing from these other partnershi

al audit and=trace all the K-1's into BRH. The IRS could readily pull this K-1 =nformation from their system. <=p> It is very surprising to =e that Deloitte nor anyone Apollo knew of these audits. Also, =t's interesting that other non-founding executives at Apollo were also recently given asses=ment not

one internally by IRS. I know that IRS sometimes does examinations=internally (client isn't contacted until "internal" audit is concluded).. Because BRH Holdings LP is mainly a h=lding entity owning many other flow-through partnership entities, IRS coul= easily trace all K-1's flowing from these other partnershi

K-1's into BRH. The IRS could readily pull this K-1 information from their system. EFTA_R1_01892934 EFTA02651304 It is very surprising to me that Deloitte nor anyone Apollo knew of these audits. Also, it's interesting that other non-founding executives at Apollo were also recently given assessment not

one internally by IRS. I know that IRS sometimes does examinations internally (client isn't contacted until "internal" audit is concluded).. Because BRH Holdings LP is mainly a holding entity owning many other flow-through partnership entities, IRS could easily trace all K-1's flowing from these other partnershi

nternal audit and=trace all the K-1's into BRH. The IRS could readily pull this K-1 =nformation from their system. It is very surprising to =e that Deloitte nor anyone Apollo knew of these audits. Also, =t's interesting that other non-founding executives at Apollo were also recently given asses=ment not

one internally by IRS. I know that IRS sometimes does examinations=internally (client isn't contacted until "internal" audit is concluded).. Because BRH Holdings LP is mainly a h=lding entity owning many other flow-through partnership entities, IRS coul= easily trace all K-1's flowing from these other partnersh

From: Thomas Turrin < Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 1:37 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: questions The tax preparer for BRH is Deloitte (and the Apollo tax dept). From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 9:31 AM To: Thomas Turrin Subject: Re: qu

can finish it this week.). I would also propose that we ask her some background info, if not volunteered on her part. Her notice plainly says that BRH Holdings LP is under review. I believe it's being examined internally. Her offer of background info will most likely be limited as to BRH, since I am not the ta

de from are JPMorgan accounts in the US in the name of these Cayman entities. Katie said Apollo does not file any FBARs for BRH at al=. Apollo had Deloitte study this issue and provide negati=e assurance on the subject. Similarly, all the accounts I have opened for Phaidon a=e US based accounts. 2 EFT

d ownership (greater than 50%) determ=ne whether an FBAR must be made. Leon does not fit in either category as it relates to A=ollo entities. While BRH Holdings LP and GP are both Cayman entities, =he accounts that distributions are made from are JPMorgan accounts in the US in the name of these Cayman entities.