Epstein Secrets

6 To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests <a> ) <->; Understood. Thanks, John. David Jones thought this approach was reasonable, but I'll check with Sarah too. Overall, I don't think we have a ton of precedent for referring folks to anothe

say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena one or the other of those districts, then we see if the subpoenaed district Touhy-refers the subpoena to Geoff as the "responsible" USA, and take it from there. So I am OK with Steven's plan for dealing with plaintiff's further requests as he outlines in his

6 To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests (USANYS) < >;I <->; Understood. Thanks, John. David Jones thought this approach was reasonable, but I'll check with Sarah too. Overall, I don't think we have a ton of precedent for referring folks to anothe

say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena one or the other of those districts, then we see if the subpoenaed district Touhy-refers the subpoena to Geoff as the "responsible" USA, and take it from there. So I am OK with Steven's plan for dealing with plaintiff's further requests as he outlines in his

:16 To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests <a> <->; Understood. Thanks, John. David Jones thought this approach was reasonable, but I'll check with Sarah too. Overall, I don't think we have a ton of precedent for referring folks to anothe

say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena one or the other of those districts, then we see if the subpoenaed district Touhy-refers the subpoena to Geoff as the "responsible" USA, and take it from there. So I am OK with Steven's plan for dealing with plaintiff's further requests as he outlines in his

16 To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) )< Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests l< >; Understood. Thanks, John. David Jones thought this approach was reasonable, but I'll check with Sarah too. Overall, I don't think we have a ton of precedent for referring folks to anothe

those districts, then we see if the subpoenaed district Touhy-refers the subpoena to Geoff as the "responsible" USA, and take it from there. So I am OK with Steven's plan for dealing with plaintiff's further requests as he outlines in his

20 17:16 To: McEnany, John (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) < Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests (USANYS) <->; Understood. Thanks, John. David Jones thought this approach was reasonable, but I'll check with Sarah too. Overall, I don't think we have a ton of precedent for referring folks to anothe

say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena one or the other of those districts, then we see if the subpoenaed district Touhy-refers the subpoena to Geoff as the "responsible" USA, and take it from there. So I am OK with Steven's plan for dealing with plaintiff's further requests as he outlines in his

McEnany, John (USANYS) < Cc: (USANYS) < ) < Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests (USANYS) < >;I <->; Understood. Thanks, John. David Jones thought this approach was reasonable, but I'll check with Sarah too. Overall, I don't think we have a ton of precedent for referring folks to anothe

say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena one or the other of those districts, then we see if the subpoenaed district Touhy-refers the subpoena to Geoff as the "responsible" USA, and take it from there. So I am OK with Steven's plan for dealing with plaintiff's further requests as he outlines in his