11
Shared Docs
11
Same-Page
11 / 11
Mentions
From: "Peter L. Corsell" To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 14:58:29 +0000 Hey, So, I forwarded your email to David and we
otentially obtaining a judgment and having to collect from Boris personally. David would like Boris to choose one of the two offers he submitted to Gunderson, based on Gunderson's original framework (the one you sent to me and then I sent it to David and then his attorneys edited it and then David signed
t am free any time after 10:30am B Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 11:44:22 -0400 Subject: Fwd: From: [email protected] To: Forwarded message From: Peter L. Corsell < I' Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 Subject: To: Jeffrey Epstein Hey, So, I forwarded your email to David and we discussed. In addition to the fact
otentially obtaining a judgment and having to collect from Boris personally. David would like Boris to choose one of the two offers he submitted to Gunderson, based on Gunderson's original framework (the one you sent to me and then I sent it to David and then his attorneys edited it and then David signed
ot in my benefit Sent from my Windows Phone From: jeffrey E. Sent: 4/30/2015 5:51 PM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: Fwd: Forwarded message From: Peter L. Corsell Date: Thursday, April 30, 2015 Subject: To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> I think what you say makes great sense. But David now wants to s
:31 +0000 I am wondering whether would be easier and faster that your attorney draft a document. I am happy to pay for his time. I am affraid that Gunderson will be slow and not in my benefit Sent from my Windows Phone From: jeffrey E. Sent: 4/30/2015 5:51 PM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: Fwd: Forwar
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Boris Nikolic Subject: Fwd: Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 00:51:58 +0000 Forwarded messa e From: Peter L. Corsell Date: Thursday, April 30, Subject: To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> I think what you say makes great sense. But David now wants to see eve
frey E." <[email protected]> I think what you say makes great sense. But David now wants to see everything in writing and signed. So he took the Gunderson document, had his lawyer edit it two ways, signed both copies and told me to forward to Steve Ray. Boris can counter, initial and sign. Or propose a
From: "Peter L. Corsell" To: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation a gmai .com> Subject: Re: Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 23:14:52 +0000 I think what you say makes great sense. But David
Thu, 30 Apr 2015 23:14:52 +0000 I think what you say makes great sense. But David now wants to see everything in writing and signed. So he took the Gunderson document, had his lawyer edit it two ways, signed both copies and told me to forward to Steve Ray. Boris can counter, initial and sign. Or propose a
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: "Peter L. Corsell" Subject: Re: Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 23:46:24 +0000 its already more than half of legal i know you are doing your best. should have new docs in the
ail.com> wrote: are we agreed otherwise On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Peter L. Corsell < wrote: Thanks, Jeffrey. Do you think you can have Gunderson make these edits to the draft and send the offer to me in writing? That will really help me push things along. That and please ask them to remove t
From: "Peter L. Corsell" To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 16:19:34 +0000 Sure thing. Will do so now. On Apr 18, 2015, at
and signed within the week. I have a number of comments and questions regarding the draft you sent. I can review them with you or with Steve Ray at Gunderson, with whom I have had a very productive dialog in the past. What would you like me to do? I would like to convey these comments and turn the documen
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 3:56 PM To: Peter L. Corsell Subject: Re: can you call me On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Pet=r L. Corsell < <mailto > wrote: I was able to have a tho=ough conversation
and signed within the week. I ha=e a number of comments and questions regarding the draft you sent. l=can review them with you or with Steve Ray at Gunderson, with whom I have =ad a very productive dialog in the past. What would you like me to d=? I would like to convey these comments and turn the documen
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 4:40 PM To: Peter L. Corsell; Boris Nikolic Subject: Re: you and i both,,, if david wants the gp idea* then he should put up the 400k as debt to the new entity,Q boric shoul
otentially obtaining a judgment and having to collect from Boris=personally. David would like Boris to choo=e one of the two offers he submitted to Gunderson, based on Gundersonl>=804,s original framework (the one you sent to me and then I sent it to Da=id and then his attorneys edited it and then David
From: Peter L. Corsell Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 4:47 PM To: jeffrey E. Cc: Boris Nikolic Subject: Re: Indeed. At least everyone can be=focused on one set of sign
ly obtaining a j=dgment and having to collect from Boris personally. </=iv> David would like Boris to choose one of the two offers he submitted=to Gunderson, based on Gunderson's original framework (the one you s=nt to me and then I sent it to David and then his attorneys edited it and t=en David signed
Entities connected to both Peter L. Corsell and Gunderson