Epstein Secrets

re were thirteen US Embassies that had been attacked killing several hundred people. Where was these same outraged Republicans? As Mark Shields and David Brooks said last Friday during PBS' Newshour when host Judy Woodruff asked how would they compared Watergate to the "scandal" hearings of the past week. M

eas were ones that they themselves once welcomed. Under the circumstances, Mr. Obama would be best advised to stop making peace offerings. Only when the Republican Party feels public pressure to become a serious partner can the real work of governing begin." Even to me, it feels that every week I am taking pot-shots

country was able to do in the 1950s and 1960s. This week joining the growing choir of Chris Cristie, Bobby Jindal, Bill Kristol and even Paul Ryan, David Brooks wrote an opt-ed in the New York Times — A Second G.O.P. - suggesting that the Republican Party needs to reinvent itself and reach beyond the bubble

Chris Cristie, Bobby Jindal, Bill Kristol and even Paul Ryan, David Brooks wrote an opt-ed in the New York Times — A Second G.O.P. - suggesting that the Republican Party needs to reinvent itself and reach beyond the bubble of those "who speak the same speak" And since 1981 when the Republican Party adopted the mantr

cracy as it easily lead to new fertile grounds for more terrorists. Also remember one persons terrorist is another person's freedom fighter. I watch David Brooks on PBS Newshour describing how Iran funds terrorist who kill American soldiers. But lets think about that - because the only American soldiers that

merican President and policies that provide access and the safety net for minorities, it is difficult for Blacks and Hispanics to feel any love from the Republican Party. With nowhere else to go, more than 92% African Americans and 76% of Hispanics vote Democrat. In a new study called "States of Change" conducted by

des" false equivalency of shying away from telling the truth about the GOP's suicide mission, pretending the same thing is happening on both sides (David Brooks's pathetic attempt to draw a false equivalency was so loathsome, he felt the need to walk back his characterization of the president's position the n

and the rest are in danger of being primaried if they don't do the Tea Party's bidding. So what is the result of all this madness? Well, for one, the Republican party, at a federal level, has become a toxic brand. Beyond the election losses in November, polling data shows that the majority of the American people

a bit of tweaking) will come close to addressing the systemic economic problems currently facing the country. New York Times cconservative olumnist David Brooks said Sunday that Republicans should shoulder most of the blame if lawmakers do not reach an agreement on the fiscal cliff ahead of Tuesday's deadlin

E.J. Dionne wrote this week in The Washington Post — It's our system on the cliff — The United States faces a crisis in our political system because the Republican Party, particularly in the House of Representatives, is no longer a normal, governing party. Republicans in the House will blame it on the Democrats, exc

WWW • WWW INTELLECTUAL JAZZ DAVID AGUS DAN ARIELY KEITH BLACK DAVID BLAINE MIKE BLOCK ADAM BLY SCOTT BOLTON DAVID BROOKS MARK CUBAN ANTONIO DAMASIO JACK DANGERMOND DAVE GALLO FRANK GEHRY MATT GROENING HERBIE HANCOCK DANNY HILLIS BJARKE INGELS QUINCY JONES MARY

nd simply stated he was not a fan of her values. In a March 2007 article published in The New York Times titled "No U-Turns", Brooks explained that the Republican Party must distance itself from the minimal- government conservative principles that had arisen during the Abraham Lincoln, Barry Goldwater, Ronald Reaga

vative ideology. Reagan brain truster James Pinkerton wrot= of a "new paradigm" that would accept the need for=government but make it more flexible. David Brooks and Bill Kristol =ailed for "national greatness conservatism" in the =radition of Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt. A more populist alternative=was offer

;font-family:Ge=rgia,serif">A unified Republican government could refuse to add new protec=ions for racial, sexual and gender minorities. But even a Republican- major=ty Supreme Court is not going to repeal Roe v. Wade or allow states to out=aw gay marriage. If these are the goals of conservatism, then the c