Epstein Secrets

nition of "coercion" which is commonly accepted, then the relevancy of the re- quested information is apparent and this appeal has no merit at all. Webster defines "coercion" as: (1) to restrain or dominate by force, (2) to compel an act or choice, or (3) to enforce or bring about by force or threat.

xt and a party may be permitted to discover evidence that would be inad- missible at trial, if it would lead to the discovery of relevant evidence. Allstate; Amente. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(1) delineates the proper scope of discovery: In General. Parties may obtain discovery regard- in

nition of "coercion" which is commonly accepted, then the relevancy of the re- quested information is apparent and this appeal has no merit at all. Webster defines "coercion" as: (I) to restrain or dominate by force, (2) to compel an act or choice, or (3) to enforce or bring about by force or threat.

xt and a party may be permitted to discover evidence that would be inad- missible at trial, if it would lead to the discovery of relevant evidence. Allstate; Amente. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(1) delineates the proper scope of discovery: In General. Parties may obtain discovery regard- in

f Sexual Assault Evidence. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, 1985, pp. 179- 187. (Reprinted, with revisions, in Ben-Aron MH, Hucker SJ, Webster CD (Eds.): Clinical Criminology: The Assessment and Treatment of Criminal Behaviour, pp. 207-219. Toronto: Clarke Institute of Psychiatry, Universi

motion hearing, 6/12/95 In the Matter of the Appeal by John Perry (Sacramento, California) Testified at administrative hearing, 6/29/95 Jerner v. Allstate (Orlando, Florida) Testified at evidentiary hearing, 9/1/95 EFTA00072971 Park Dietz, M.D., M.P.H., Ph.D. Page 26 Am. Natl. Fire Ins. Co. v. Bir