Epstein Secrets

"coerce" minors to travel to engage in prohibited sexual conduct and "enticing" minors to engage in commercial sex acts. (S2 Ind. ¶¶ 12, 24, 27).1° Webster's Dictionary defines the word "entice" to mean "to attract artfully or adroitly or by arousing hope or desire; tempt" and the further explains that

States v. Skys, 637 F.3d 146 (2d Cir. 2011) 16 United States v. Suarez, No. 21-1721, 2022 WL 1449174 (3d Cir. May 9, 2022) 13 United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205 (2d Cir. 1990) 3 United States v. Tykarsky, 446 F.3d 458 (3d Cir. 2006) 3 United States v. Watkins, 667 F.3d 254 (2d Cir. 2012)

LRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 227 (1978) 9, 10 NRDC v. EPA, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124353 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2019) 20 Pratt v. Webster, 673 F.2d 408 (D.C. Cir. 1982) 9 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 10 United States v. Noel, No. 19-CR-00830-AT (S.D.N.Y.

ey had not done so. (The focus of those prosecutions is on the false certifications they are alleged to have signed.) A June 9, 2020 order by Judge Torres, denying Thomas's motion to compel "disclosure of `reports generated by 7 The Government's vague allegations of the impact of disclosure on juror te

st an offender before a legal tribunal, and pursuing them to final judgment on behalf of the state or government, as by indictment or information." Webster :r New International, supra, at 1987. Moreover, the law is clear, at least for Sixth Amendment right-to-counsel purposes, that a "prosecution" doe

on of maintaining a set of statutes that reflect, rather than distort, the policy choices that elected representatives have made." C • OAlmendarez- Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 237-38,118 S. Ct. 1219, 1277-28, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). To that end, the Supreme Court has cautioned that, "rewrit

LRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 227 (1978) 9, 10 NRDC v. EPA, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124353 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2019) 20 Pratt v. Webster, 673 F.2d 408 (D.C. Cir. 1982) 9 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 10 United States v. Noel, No. 19-CR-00830-AT (S.D.N.Y.

ey had not done so. (The focus of those prosecutions is on the false certifications they are alleged to have signed.) A June 9, 2020 order by Judge Torres, denying Thomas's motion to compel "disclosure of `reports generated by 7 The Government's vague allegations of the impact of disclosure on juror te