Epstein Secrets

quested the case be postponed until the August 21, 2008 hearing date. Mr. Trump’s attorney and the attorney for the new purchaser were both present. Robert Brody said he was the attorney for County Road Property LLC, who had just purchased the property two days ago. He said it was the intent of his client to c

erty two days ago. He said it was the intent of his client to comply with the Town and also to work with the Town. There is an appeal pending and Mr. Brody said it was his client’s intent to work everything out with ARCOM prior to that appeal. He said he had recommended to his client that he withdraw the

re of this particular code provision. Had he been, they would have applied for an extension of time to complete the construction. At the hearing, Mr. Koeppel made a motion to allow them an additional sixty (60) days to complete the construction, find them in non- compliance and assess the $150 costs. After

uested this case be postponed until the August 21, 2008 hearing date. Mr. Trump’s attorney and the attorney for the new purchaser were both present. Robert Brody said he was the attorney for County Road Property LLC, who had just purchased the property two days ago. He said it was the intent of his client to c

erty two days ago. He said it was the intent of his client to comply with the Town and also to work with the Town. There is an appeal pending and Mr. Brody said it was his client’s intent to work everything out with ARCOM prior to that appeal. He said he had recommended to his client that he withdraw the

of this particular Code provision. Had he been, they would have applied for an extension of time to complete the construction. At the hearing, Mr. Koeppel made a motion to allow them an additional sixty (60) days to complete the construction, find them in non- compliance and assess the $150 fee. After

quested the case be postponed until the August 21, 2008 hearing date. Mr. Trump’s attorney and the attorney for the new purchaser were both present. Robert Brody said he was the attorney for County Road Property LLC, who had just purchased the property two days ago. He said it was the intent of his client to c

erty two days ago. He said it was the intent of his client to comply with the Town and also to work with the Town. There is an appeal pending and Mr. Brody said it was his client’s intent to work everything out with ARCOM prior to that appeal. He said he had recommended to his client that he withdraw the

re of this particular code provision. Had he been, they would have applied for an extension of time to complete the construction. At the hearing, Mr. Koeppel made a motion to allow them an additional sixty (60) days to complete the construction, find them in non- compliance and assess the $150 costs. After