Epstein Secrets

ined that both the business and the property owner were cited. Mr. Fried inquired about service and Mr. Gerry said it was sent by certified mail. Mr. Ballentine asked if any attempts, other than by mail, were made to get in touch with someone at the business. Mr. Gerry said he went to the business, was told t

rior to that appeal. He said he had recommended to his client that he withdraw the appeal. Mr. Brody said his client had hired the Lawrence Group and Gene Lawrence planned to work with ARCOM. MOTION BY MS. DUEMLER TO POSTPONE THE CASE UNTIL AUGUST 21, 2008 SECONDED BY MS. VAN BUREN MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY

ined that both the business and the property owner were cited. Mr. Fried inquired about service and Mr. Gerry said it was sent by certified mail. Mr. Ballentine asked if any attempts, other than by mail, were made to get in touch with someone at the business. Mr. Gerry said he went to the business, was told t

rior to that appeal. He said he had recommended to his client that he withdraw the appeal. Mr. Brody said his client had hired the Lawrence Group and Gene Lawrence planned to work with ARCOM. MOTION BY MS. DUEMLER TO POSTPONE THE CASE UNTIL THE AUGUST 21, 2008 MEETING SECONDED BY MS. VAN BUREN [2 HOUSE_OVERSI

ined that both the business and the property owner were cited. Mr. Fried inquired about service and Mr. Gerry said it was sent by certified mail. Mr. Ballentine asked if any attempts, other than by mail, were made to get in touch with someone at the business. Mr. Gerry said he went to the business, was told t

rior to that appeal. He said he had recommended to his client that he withdraw the appeal. Mr. Brody said his client had hired the Lawrence Group and Gene Lawrence planned to work with ARCOM. MOTION BY MS. DUEMLER TO POSTPONE THE CASE UNTIL AUGUST 21, 2008 SECONDED BY MS. VAN BUREN MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY