Epstein Secrets

and welfare. (Mr. Ochstein recused himself, stating that he has a relative who has a business relationship with Dr. Lynn and Mr. Hoffman advised Mr. Vanneck would be a voting member in this case) Sgt. Curtis Krauel said this case was brought to Code Enforcement through a culmination of events spanning ba

en a good corporate citizen and had never been before the Board except on one occasion which was beyond his control; it was a maintenance item on the Glazer house. Mr. Walton said that situation was not due to Mr. Wagner’s fault, that he was just representing the owner. Mr. Ballentine asked how Mr. Wagne

and welfare. (Mr. Ochstein recused himself, stating that he has a relative who has a business relationship with Dr. Lynn and Mr. Hoffman advised Mr. Vanneck would be a voting member in this case) Sgt. Curtis Krauel said this case was brought to Code Enforcement through a culmination of events spanning ba

a good corporate citizen, he had never been before the Board except on one occasion and that was beyond his control, it was a maintenance item on the Glazer house. Mr. Walton said that situation was not due to Mr. Wagner’s fault, that he was just representing the owner. Mr. Ballentine asked how Mr. Wagne

and welfare. (Mr. Ochstein recused himself, stating that he has a relative who has a business relationship with Dr. Lynn and Mr. Hoffman advised Mr. Vanneck would be a voting member in this case) Sgt. Curtis Krauel said this case was brought to Code Enforcement through a culmination of events spanning ba

en a good corporate citizen and had never been before the Board except on one occasion which was beyond his control; it was a maintenance item on the Glazer house. Mr. Walton said that situation was not due to Mr. Wagner’s fault, that he was just representing the owner. Mr. Ballentine asked how Mr. Wagne