Epstein Secrets

he would like for the Board to first consider whether there had been a violation of 10-6 and to make a motion one way or the other with regard to the Staff's recommendation. He then requested that Section 10-45 be entertained separately after Dr. Lynn’s attorney and anyone else who wanted to speak had an

rior to that appeal. He said he had recommended to his client that he withdraw the appeal. Mr. Brody said his client had hired the Lawrence Group and Gene Lawrence planned to work with ARCOM. MOTION BY MS. DUEMLER TO POSTPONE THE CASE UNTIL AUGUST 21, 2008 SECONDED BY MS. VAN BUREN MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY

ing he is required to do. Mr. Randolph said he hesitated to explain further if the matter was going to be deferred. Mr. Randolph said the position of Staff is that item (i) stands on its own merits, that it is not connected to 10-45 (a) through (h). It is also the position of Staff that it is appropriate

rior to that appeal. He said he had recommended to his client that he withdraw the appeal. Mr. Brody said his client had hired the Lawrence Group and Gene Lawrence planned to work with ARCOM. MOTION BY MS. DUEMLER TO POSTPONE THE CASE UNTIL THE AUGUST 21, 2008 MEETING SECONDED BY MS. VAN BUREN [2 HOUSE_OVERSI

he would like for the Board to first consider whether there had been a violation of 10-6 and to make a motion one way or the other with regard to the Staff's recommendation. He then requested that Section 10-45 be entertained separately after Dr. Lynn’s attorney and anyone else who wanted to speak had an

rior to that appeal. He said he had recommended to his client that he withdraw the appeal. Mr. Brody said his client had hired the Lawrence Group and Gene Lawrence planned to work with ARCOM. MOTION BY MS. DUEMLER TO POSTPONE THE CASE UNTIL AUGUST 21, 2008 SECONDED BY MS. VAN BUREN MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY