Epstein Secrets

]he only factual issue in the case was whether petitioners dominant purpose in making the trip was to facilitate her practice of prostitution. . .); Cleveland v. United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence . . . that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive."). There is no basis for co

• LAW OFFICES OF GEZRALD B. LErcouar, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION raw YORE, NEW YORK 10021 GERALD B. LEFC0URT BY HAND February 1, 2007 ., Assistant United States Attorney puty Chief, Northern Region ice o t e rr mte tates Attorney Southern Dis

T]he only factual issue in the case was whether paitioners dominant purpose in making the trip was to facilitate her practice of prostitution. . .); Cleveland I United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence .. . that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive."). There is no basis for conc

736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 000749 EFTA00184623 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-43 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 22 of 26 LAW OFFICES or GERALD B. ince -ant, P.C. A , Esq., Assistant United States Attorney Andrew Lourie, Esq., Deputy Chief, Northern Region Office of the United States Attorne

tates, 242 U.S. 470 (1917). The statute's primary purpose was to address the so-called commercial case of transporting females for immoral purposes. Cleveland v. United States, 329 U.S. 14 (1946) (even though the Act includes some non-commercial cases within its scope, its primary focus is commercial sexu

all the issues we have raised herein or any other lingering concerns you have. Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013322 EFTA00230227 LAW CONCIES Or GERALD B. IncounT, P.C. A. Esq. O ce o the United States Attorney Southern District of Florida June 25, 2007 Page 19 Thank you for your cooperation in t