Epstein Secrets

an Dershowitz, Esq. November 19, 2007 Page 14 interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement.") (emphasis added); Cleveland v. United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence ... that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive.").' Under these standards, the

at 193 (1996) (Conf.Rep.)). See also K. Seto, Note: How Should Legislation Deal with Children and the Victims and Perpetrators of Cyherstallcine?, 9 Cardozo Women's L.J. 67 (2002). In enacting subsection (b), Congressional concerns were focused on a particular and recent phenomenon. Young people were using the

t be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement") (emphasis added)• Cleveland v, United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive.").2 Under these standards, there i

at 193 (1996) (Conf. Rep.)). ace ast K. Seto, Note- How S_hould Legislation Deal with Children and the Victims aid terpetrators of Cyberstalicina? 9 Cardozo Women's L.J. 67 (2002). in enacting subsection (b), Congressional concerns were focused on a particular and recent phenomenon. Young people were using the

t be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement") (emphasis added)• Cleveland United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive.").2 Under these standards, there is

at 193 (1996) (Conf.Rep.)). ace ast K. Seto, Note- How S_hould Legislation Dcal with Children and the Victims aid terpetrators of Cyberstalicina? 9 Cardozo Women's L.J. 67 (2002). in enacting subsection (b), Congressional concerns were focused on a particular and recent phenomenon. Young people were using the

be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement.") (emphasis added); Cleveland I, United States 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence ... that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive.").2 Under these standards, there

, at 193 (1996) (Con£Rep.)). See also K. Seto, Note; How Should Legislation Deal with Children and the Victims and Perpetrators of cyberstallcing? 9 Cardozo Women's L.J. 67 (2002). In enacting subsection (b), Congressional concerns were focused on a particular and recent phenomenon. Young people were using the

be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement.") (emphasis added); Cleveland v. United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence ... that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive." ).r Under these standards, the

at 193 (1996) (Conf.Rep.)). See also K. Seto, Note; How Should Lepislation Deal with Children and the Victims and Perpetrators of Cyberstalking? 9 Cardozo Women's L.J. 67 (2002). In enacting subsection (b), Congressional concerns were focused on a particular and recent phenomenon: Young people were using the