Epstein Secrets

nny Crim. Investigation Command, 742 F. Supp. 2d 68 (D.D.C. 2010) 9 Hopkins v. U.S. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 929 F.2d 81 (2d Cir. 1991) 19 Human Rights Watch v. Dep't ofJustice & Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123592 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015) 9 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Commer

ofJustice, 872 F. Supp. 2d 309 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) 3 Nat'l Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157 (2004) 15 Nat'l Council of La Raza v. Dep't ofJustice, 411 F.3d 350 (2d Cir. 2005) 6 iv EFTA00071627 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 27 Filed 09/10/20 Page 5 of 29 NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co

mmigration Servs., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134482 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 2020) 2 Grand Central P 'ship, Inc. v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473 (2d Cir. 1999). 8 Human Rights Watch v. DOJ Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123592 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015) 2 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Commerce, 375 F. Su

access to agency investigatory files" that would bear on the prosecution than he would under the rules of criminal procedure. New York Times Co. v. Dep't ofJustice, 390 F. Supp. 3d 499, 512 (S.D.N.Y. 2019). But, as to least one important category, emails of Tartaglione's counsel, he already has access to those

nny Crim. Investigation Command, 742 F. Supp. 2d 68 (D.D.C. 2010) 9 Hopkins v. U.S. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 929 F.2d 81 (2d Cir. 1991) 19 Human Rights Watch v. Dep't ofJustice & Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123592 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015) 9 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Commer

ofJustice, 872 F. Supp. 2d 309 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) 3 Nat'l Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157 (2004) 15 Nat'l Council of La Raza v. Dep't ofJustice, 411 F.3d 350 (2d Cir. 2005) 6 iv EFTA00088704 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 27 Filed 09/10/20 Page 5 of 29 NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co