Epstein Secrets

ts con- sideration of the Defendants' motions for failure to state a claim. See Part III below. Plaintiffs place great reliance on Halber- stam v. Welch, 705 F.2d 472 (D.C.Cir.1983) and Bairn v. Qitnotic Literacy Institute. & Holy Land Foundation for Relief & Devel- opment, 291 FM 1000, 1023 (7th Ci

able to Plaintiffs. PDK Labs, 103 F.3cl at 1108. It will not, however, accept legally conclusory assertions or draw "argumenta- tive inferences." Mende v. Milestone Tech, Inc-, 269 F.Supp.2d 246, 251 (S.D.N.Y.2003) (citing Robinson v. Over Military Sales Coip., 21 F.3d 502, 507 (2d Cir.1994)). A.

0. Oh. by tim lawyer? 17 A. It O. Ahem did tem min aaaaa oas that you had 19 with the gill take plan? 20 A. At my • residence. 21 0. Welch le Moroi 22 A. On LOaahleenee. 23 0. On wine> 24 A. in nablatchee. 25 0. And when did that tae pled? --------- 1655PnatatrUnf —~~ --t•

8-cv-80119-KAM Document 15-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2008 Page 18 of 35 0 0 U tiOnsor & Associates Money r.0e 65 Mendel yes delola ye. Mende pre42 2 A couple days 492' 3 0. we. told you to tate your leySpece pope to... 4 • couplo of days mo? 5 A. Mobady• I's *Mk dad tired at elyM

its con- sideration of the Defendants’ motions for failure to state a claim. See Part III below. Plaintiffs place great reliance on Halber- stam v. Welch, 705 F.2d 472 (D.C.Cir.1983) and Bowm v. Quranic Literacy Institute. & Holy Land Foundation for Relief & Devel- opment, 291 F.3d 1000, 1028 (7th Cir.

03 F.3d at 1108. It will not, however, accept legally 349 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 2d SERIES conclusory assertions or draw “argumenta- tive inferences.” Mende v. Milestone Tech, Inc, 269 F.Supp.2d 246, 251 (S.D.N.Y.2003) (citing Robinson v. Over- seas Military Sales Corp., 21 F.3d 502, 507 (2d Cir.1994)).