Epstein Secrets

ere was none. For those reasons, the Board recommended that defendant be designated a level-three sex offender. At the SORA hearing before Justice Pickholz, defendant essentially took the position that the level-three designation could not be supported by the crimes with which he had actually been char

Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT INTRODUCTION Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), entered on January 18, 2011, adjudicating him a level-three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ("SORA"). By the under

or rubbed their vaginal areas with a vibrator; defendant masturbated to climax, and at that point the massage ended (A25- 26). -28- EFTA00792531 The Recommendations Of The Board Pursuant to the mandate of Corrections Law Section 168-1, the Board issued a "Case Summary" and a completed "Risk Assessment Instrument" with respe

ere was none. For those reasons, the Board recommended that defendant be designated a level-three sex offender. At the SORA hearing before Justice Pickholz, defendant essentially took the position that the level-three designation could not be supported by the crimes with which he had actually been char

Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT INTRODUCTION Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), entered on January 18, 2011, adjudicating him a level-three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ("SORA"). By the under

or rubbed their vaginal areas with a vibrator; defendant masturbated to climax, and at that point the massage ended (A25- 26). -28- EFTA00602369 The Recommendations Of The Board Pursuant to the mandate of Corrections Law Section 168-1, the Board issued a "Case Summary" and a completed "Risk Assessment Instrument" with respe

Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT INTRODUCTION Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), entered on January 18, 2011, adjudicating him a level-three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ("SORA"). By the under

ere was none. For those reasons, the Board recommended that defendant be designated a level-three sex offender. At the SORA hearing before Justice Pickholz, defendant essentially took the position that the level-three designation could not be supported by the crimes with which he had actually been char

or rubbed their vaginal areas with a vibrator; defendant masturbated to climax, and at that point the massage ended (A25- 26). -28- EFTA00181178 The Recommendations Of The Board Pursuant to the mandate of Corrections Law Section 168-1, the Board issued a "Case Summary" and a completed "Risk Assessment Instrument" with respe