Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
6 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ere was none. For those reasons, the Board recommended that defendant be designated a level-three sex offender. At the SORA hearing before Justice Pickholz, defendant essentially took the position that the level-three designation could not be supported by the crimes with which he had actually been char
Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT INTRODUCTION Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), entered on January 18, 2011, adjudicating him a level-three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ("SORA"). By the under
re. After hearing argument from both parties, and reviewing all the materials that had been submitted, the court adopted the recommendation made by the SORA Board and found defendant to be a level-three sex offender. On appeal, defendant contends that he was incorrectly classified a level-three offender and
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ere was none. For those reasons, the Board recommended that defendant be designated a level-three sex offender. At the SORA hearing before Justice Pickholz, defendant essentially took the position that the level-three designation could not be supported by the crimes with which he had actually been char
Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT INTRODUCTION Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), entered on January 18, 2011, adjudicating him a level-three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ("SORA"). By the under
re. After hearing argument from both parties, and reviewing all the materials that had been submitted, the court adopted the recommendation made by the SORA Board and found defendant to be a level-three sex offender. On appeal, defendant contends that he was incorrectly classified a level-three offender and
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT INTRODUCTION Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), entered on January 18, 2011, adjudicating him a level-three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ("SORA"). By the under
ere was none. For those reasons, the Board recommended that defendant be designated a level-three sex offender. At the SORA hearing before Justice Pickholz, defendant essentially took the position that the level-three designation could not be supported by the crimes with which he had actually been char
re. After hearing argument from both parties, and reviewing all the materials that had been submitted, the court adopted the recommendation made by the SORA Board and found defendant to be a level-three sex offender. On appeal, defendant contends that he was incorrectly classified a level-three offender and
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (48)
Entities connected to both Ruth Pickholz and the SORA Board
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON40 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
New York
LOCATION30 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
New York City
LOCATION28 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION21 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
New York State
LOCATION17 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON12 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON11 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
The Palm Beach Post
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
CYRUS R. VANCE
PERSON9 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
Legislature
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
Nissan
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
Western Union
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
Felony Solicitation of Prostitution
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
FIRST DEPARTMENT
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
Sarah Ferguson
PERSON7 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
Juan Alessi
PERSON7 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
JB
Janusz Banasiack
PERSON7 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
JA
Jose Alessi
PERSON7 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
NM
Nadia Marcinkova
PERSON8 w/ Ruth·2 w/ the
Palm Beach Police Department
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the