Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
6 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ere was none. For those reasons, the Board recommended that defendant be designated a level-three sex offender. At the SORA hearing before Justice Pickholz, defendant essentially took the position that the level-three designation could not be supported by the crimes with which he had actually been char
Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT INTRODUCTION Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), entered on January 18, 2011, adjudicating him a level-three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ("SORA"). By the under
uments dated fully two years apart. The People's evidence on remand would include proof that defendant had engaged in aggressive negotiations with the Palm Beach State's Attorney's Office even before indictment; that, after the State's Attorney's Office obtained a single-count indictment, Florida federal authorities
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ere was none. For those reasons, the Board recommended that defendant be designated a level-three sex offender. At the SORA hearing before Justice Pickholz, defendant essentially took the position that the level-three designation could not be supported by the crimes with which he had actually been char
Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT INTRODUCTION Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), entered on January 18, 2011, adjudicating him a level-three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ("SORA"). By the under
uments dated fully two years apart. The People's evidence on remand would include proof that defendant had engaged in aggressive negotiations with the Palm Beach State's Attorney's Office even before indictment; that, after the State's Attorney's Office obtained a single-count indictment, Florida federal authorities
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT INTRODUCTION Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), entered on January 18, 2011, adjudicating him a level-three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ("SORA"). By the under
ere was none. For those reasons, the Board recommended that defendant be designated a level-three sex offender. At the SORA hearing before Justice Pickholz, defendant essentially took the position that the level-three designation could not be supported by the crimes with which he had actually been char
uments dated fully two years apart. The People's evidence on remand would include proof that defendant had engaged in aggressive negotiations with the Palm Beach State's Attorney's Office even before indictment; that, after the State's Attorney's Office obtained a single-count indictment, Florida federal authorities
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (57)
Entities connected to both Ruth Pickholz and the Palm Beach State's
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON40 w/ Ruth·9 w/ the
New York
LOCATION30 w/ Ruth·4 w/ the
New York City
LOCATION28 w/ Ruth·4 w/ the
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION21 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
New York State
LOCATION17 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON12 w/ Ruth·7 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Ruth·6 w/ the
United States
LOCATION10 w/ Ruth·6 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION8 w/ Ruth·6 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON11 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
The Palm Beach Post
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
CYRUS R. VANCE
PERSON9 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
Legislature
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
Western Union
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
Nissan
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
Juan Alessi
PERSON7 w/ Ruth·4 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Ruth·5 w/ the
Felony Solicitation of Prostitution
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
JB
Janusz Banasiack
PERSON7 w/ Ruth·3 w/ the
NM
Nadia Marcinkova
PERSON8 w/ Ruth·2 w/ the