Epstein Secrets

THE STATE OF NEW YORK, : App. Div. No. 6081 Respondent, ; On Appeal from New York Supreme Court, : New York County, Index No. 30129/10 - against - : (Pickholz, J.) JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, ; Defendant-Appellant. x NOTICE OF MOTION BY NYP HOLDINGS, INC. TQ UNSEAL APPELLATE BRIEFS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon t

ister as Level 3 — which would require he travel to New York every 90 days and check in with cops. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016459 --- PAGE BREAK --- Judge Ruth Pickholz was flabbergasted. She couldn’t understand why the DA would want to go easy on Epstein, after the New York State Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders

PAGE BREAK --- Judge Ruth Pickholz was flabbergasted. She couldn’t understand why the DA would want to go easy on Epstein, after the New York State Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders recommended the Level 3 status because there was more than just the one victim for which he pleaded guilty. “I have to tell you, I’m a little overw

lm Beach Sheriffs Office Booking Card for Jeffrey Epstein, dated June 30, 2008 A47 EFTA00181235 UI PAGE Letter from Jay P. Leflcowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz Requesting a Continuance of the Hearing, dated September 9, 2010 A77 Letter from Supreme Court to Sex Offender Registry Unit Enclosing Final Det

The Honorable Ruth Pickholz New York County Supreme Court Part 66 It 1 Centre Street New York, NY 10013 Re: SCID No. 30129-2010 Dear Justice Pickholz: I ant writing regarding the hearing for Mr. Jeffrey Epstein in the above-referenced matter, which is currently scheduled for 9:30>a.m. on Wednesda

ATTORNEY AT LAW 20 PARK PLAZA, SUITE 1000 EMAR. ADDRESSES: BOSTON. MASSACHUSETTS 02116 FAX NIOIIT EMERGENCY: August 16, 2010 New York State Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders 4 Tower Place Albany, New York 12203-3764 Re: Jeffrey Epstein NYSID # OS1909 Dear Sir or Madam: This letter and the accompanying materials are

Case #30129-2010 Dear ADA Gaffney and ADA Egan: As you are aware, we represent Jeffrey E. Epstein, who is scheduled to appear before the Honorable Ruth Pickholz in New York Supreme Court, Part 66, on Tuesday, November 9, 2010 for a hearing pursuant to New York's Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), Correcti

ffender registration decisions of every other law enforcement agency that has considered Jeffrey Epstein and his case, the submission of New York's Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders is legally infirm, in that it is entirely premised on uncharged hearsay allegations contained in an 86-page police report that has been deemed unre