Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Pe105. Martin Pelikan. Hierarchical Bayesian Optimization Algorithm: Toward a New Generation of Evolutionary Algorithms. Springer, 2005. Pen96. Roger Penrose. Shadows of the Mind. Oxford University Press, 1996. Per70. William C. Perry. Forma of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A
Lev Vygotsky. Thought and Language. MIT Press, 1986. WAIO. Wendell Wallach and Cohn Atkins. Moral Machines. Oxford University Press, 2010. Wan95. P. Wang. Non-Axiomatic Reasoning System. PhD Thesis, Indiana University. Bloomington, 1995. Wan06. Pei Wang. Rigid Flexibility: The Logic of Intelligence.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
1934. Pel05. Martin Pelikan. Hierarchical Bayesian Optimization Algorithm: Toward a New Generation of Evolutionary Algorithms. Springer, 2005. Pen96. Roger Penrose. Shadows of the Mind. Oxford University Press, 1996. Per70. William G. Perry. Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A S
Lev Vygotsky. Thought and Language. MIT Press, 1986. WA1O. Wendell Wallach and Colin Atkins. Moral Machines. Oxford University Press, 2010. Wan95. P. Wang. Non-Aziomatic Reasoning System. PhD Thesis, Indiana University. Bloomington, 1995. Wan06. Pei Wang. Rigid Flexibility: The Logic of Intelligence. S
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
he could never decide which of two theses he wanted to defend: AJ is impossible! or Al is possible but evil! He wanted to argue, with John Searle and Roger Penrose, that “Strong AI” is impossible, but there are no good arguments for that conclusion. After all, everything we now know suggests that, as I have put
definition unpredictable by us and their ' Omohundro, “The Basic AI Drives,” in Proc. First AGI Conf., 171: “Artificial General Intelligence,” eds. P. Wang, B. Goertzel, & S. Franklin (IOS press, 2008). 30 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016833 imperfectly specified objectives conflicting with our own—whose motivatio
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
he could never decide which of two theses he wanted to defend: AJ is impossible! or Al is possible but evil! He wanted to argue, with John Searle and Roger Penrose, that “Strong AI” is impossible, but there are no good arguments for that conclusion. After all, everything we now know suggests that, as I have put
definition unpredictable by us and their ' Omohundro, “The Basic AI Drives,” in Proc. First AGI Conf., 171: “Artificial General Intelligence,” eds. P. Wang, B. Goertzel, & S. Franklin (IOS press, 2008). 30 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016250 imperfectly specified objectives conflicting with our own—whose motivatio
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (971)
Entities connected to both Roger Penrose and P. Wang
Stuart Hameroff
PERSON24 w/ Roger·2 w/ P.
Stephen Hawking
PERSON11 w/ Roger·4 w/ P.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON10 w/ Roger·4 w/ P.
Quantum
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Roger·2 w/ P.
Woody Allen
PERSON9 w/ Roger·4 w/ P.
Shanghai
LOCATION11 w/ Roger·2 w/ P.
Michael Douglas
PERSON8 w/ Roger·4 w/ P.
Prince Andrew
PERSON7 w/ Roger·4 w/ P.
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON7 w/ Roger·4 w/ P.
ST
Stuart
PERSON9 w/ Roger·2 w/ P.
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON6 w/ Roger·4 w/ P.
Daniel Dennett
PERSON6 w/ Roger·4 w/ P.
Oliver Stone
PERSON6 w/ Roger·4 w/ P.
Joscha Bach
PERSON8 w/ Roger·2 w/ P.
George W. Bush
PERSON6 w/ Roger·4 w/ P.
Marc Rich
PERSON5 w/ Roger·4 w/ P.
CW
Courtney Wild
PERSON5 w/ Roger·4 w/ P.
Marvin Minsky
PERSON5 w/ Roger·4 w/ P.
Stephen Wolfram
PERSON4 w/ Roger·4 w/ P.
Vicky Ward
PERSON4 w/ Roger·4 w/ P.