Epstein Secrets

,EricSchmidt , Anne Treisman <treisman Princeton.edu>,CraigVenter<*cventer vi.org>, Jimmy Wales ,EvanWilliams , Yossi Verdi Nathan Wolfe • , Stephen Wolfram , Mark Zuckerberg Subject: David Brooks New York Times column on the Edge Morality event Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:40:07 +0000 Eastover Farm 203

anny Hillis <dann minds.net>, Arianna Huffington Anne Chad Hurley Vinod Khosla Dean Kamen Xeni Jardin <xen eni.net>, Bill , Salar Kamangar , Kevin Kelly <[email protected]>, Evgeny Lebedev <[email protected]>, Benoit Mandelbrot 4)enoit.mandelbroVie ,ale.edu>, Marissa Mayer , Dave Morin -,SendhilMullainathan<mu

mangar , Evgeny Lebedev , Dave Morin athan Myhrvold Jean Pigozzi "J.E. Safra/Doumanian" , Eric Schmidt Jeff Skoll Yossi Vardi , Crai Venter Stephen Wolfram , Mark Zuckerberg Subject: Edge 322: W. Daniel Hillis: The Hillis Knowledge Web: An Idea Whose Time Has Come Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:05:42 +0000

NEWS The Technium, Salon, Die Presse, BoingBoing, Medgadget, Computing THE TECHNIUM July, 2010 PREDICTING THE PRESENT, FIRST FIVE YEARS OF WIRED Kevin Kelly I was digging through some files the other day and found this document from 1997. It gathers a set of quotes from issues of Wired magazine in its f

Yossi Vardi e D son , ill Gates , Maja Hoffmann Joichi Ito Vinod Dean Kamen Marvin Minsky Elon Musk • , Pierre Omid ar Pte Crai Venter Stephen Wolfram , Mark Zuckerberg , Subject: Edge 322: W. Daniel Hillis: The Hillis Knowledge Web: An Idea Whose Time Has Come Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:26:54 +0

EWS The Technium, Salon, Die Presse, BoingBoing, Medgadget, Computing THE TECHNI1JM July, 2010 PREDICTING THE PRESENT, FIRST FIVE YEARS OF WIRED Kevin Kelly I was digging through some files the other day and found this document from 1997. It gathers a set of quotes from issues of Wired magazine in its f

rofound engagement with the most important scientific minds who have been thinking about AI—from Alison Gopnik and David Deutsch to Frank Wilczek and Stephen Wolfram— Deep Thinking 1s an ideal introduction to the landscape of crucial issues AI presents. The collision between opposing perspectives is salutary and

ieve, an approach that may work. Humans can reasonably be described as having (mostly implicit) preferences over their future lives—that is, given @ Kevin Kelly, “The Myth of a Superhuman AI,” Wired, Apr. 25, 2017. 33 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016836 enough time and unlimited visual aids, a human could express a pre

rofound engagement with the most important scientific minds who have been thinking about AI—from Alison Gopnik and David Deutsch to Frank Wilczek and Stephen Wolfram— Deep Thinking 1s an ideal introduction to the landscape of crucial issues AI presents. The collision between opposing perspectives is salutary and

ieve, an approach that may work. Humans can reasonably be described as having (mostly implicit) preferences over their future lives—that is, given @ Kevin Kelly, “The Myth of a Superhuman AI,” Wired, Apr. 25, 2017. 33 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016253 enough time and unlimited visual aids, a human could express a pre