Epstein Secrets

467-1223 6 4 337-3716 facsimile) JOHN BERANEK Fla. Bar No.: 0005419 AUSLEY & MCMULLEN, P.A. 123 South Calhoun Street P.O. Box 391 (zip 32302) Tallahassee, FL 32301 Telephone: (850) 224-9115 Facsimile: 850 222-7560 EFTA00589617 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CITATIONS ii PRELIMINARY STATEMENT I ST

law presented in the case at hand, and conducts a detailed analysis of the seminal Florida Supreme Court cases germane to the issues. In Wolfe, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's order granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings in an abuse of process and malicious prosecution a

been litigated and withdrew, indisputably occurred during and were related to the judicial proceedings. Attorneys and Law Firms Michael E. Allen, Tallahassee. for appellants. Hunton & Williams LLP, and Marty Steinberg and Jeffrey W. Gutchess; Ross & Girten, and Lauri Waldman Ross, Miami, for appellees.

EASED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE PERMANENT LAW REPORTS. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. Harold E. WOLFE, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. Jeffrey T. FOREMAN, et al., Appellees. No. 3D10-3055. I July 17, 2013. Synopsis Background: Partn

(facsimile) [email protected] JOHN BERANEK Fla. Bar No.: 0005419 AUSLEY & MCMULLEN, P.A. 123 South Calhoun Street P.O. Box 391 (zip 32302) Tallahassee, FL 32301 Telephone: (850) 224-9115 Facsimile: (850) 222-7560 [email protected] EFTA00714920 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CITATIONS ii PRELI

al to this Court and is set for Oral Argument on April 28, 2015. 10 EFTA00714933 Florida Supreme Court cases germane to the issues. In Wolfe, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's order granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings in an abuse of process and malicious prosecution a

01 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 JOHN BERANEK Fla. Bar No.: 0005419 AUSLEY & MCMULLEN, P.A. 123 South Calhoun Street P.O. Box 391 (zip 32302) Tallahassee. FL 32301 Exhibit B EFTA00613586 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CITATIONS ii PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT 2 STAND

t, everything that he did 12 thereafter was an abuse of process. 13 We would put it to Your Honor that's not 14 the standard as espoused by the Third District 15 Court Of Appeal, the Fourth District Court Of 16 Appeal, or the Florida Supreme Court. The :7 standard is: Did the action have some relation