Epstein Secrets

efender, and Thomas Regnier, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, Florida, for Petitioner Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, Bureau Chief, Linda S. Katz and Paulette R. Taylor, Assistant Attorneys General, Miami,

y stimulating visual or auditory material." Ch. 2005-67, § 4, at 467, Laws of Fla.; § 948.30(1)(g), Fla. Stat. (2005) (emphasis supplied). 10. See Webster's Collegiate Dictionary 53 (10th ed. 1996) ("any . . . adj. . . . unmeasured or unlimited in amount, number, or extent" (emphasis supplied)). 11. a

; West's F.S.A. §§ 772.014, 796.09; West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1280(b)(1). *1076 Richard E. Johnson and Heather Fisher Lind- say, of Spriggs a Johnson, Tallahassee, for Peti- tioners. Mark S. Peters of Amari, Theriac & Esenmenger, P.A., Cocoa, for Respondents. W. SHARP. Judge. Bales and Shumate petition this

nition of "coercion" which is commonly accepted, then the relevancy of the re- quested information is apparent and this appeal has no merit at all. Webster defines "coercion" as: (1) to restrain or dominate by force, (2) to compel an act or choice, or (3) to enforce or bring about by force or threat.

West's F.S.A. §§ 772.014, 796.09; West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(b)(1). *1076 Richard E. Johnson and Heather Fisher Lind- say, of Spriggs & Johnson, Tallahassee, for Peti- tioners. Mark S. Peters of Amari, Theriac & Eisenmenger, P.A., Cocoa, for Respondents. W. SHARP, Judge. Batas and Shumate petition thi

nition of "coercion" which is commonly accepted, then the relevancy of the re- quested information is apparent and this appeal has no merit at all. Webster defines "coercion" as: (I) to restrain or dominate by force, (2) to compel an act or choice, or (3) to enforce or bring about by force or threat.

ent Calendar. United States Court of Appeals. Eleventh Circuit. April 14, 1989. Keith C. Tischler, Parker, Skelding, Cos- tigan, McVey & Labasky, Tallahassee, Fla., for defendant-appellant. Evan I. Fetterman and Salvatore Seibet- ta. Fetterman & Associates, North Palm Beach, Fla., for plaintiffs-appelle

e attorneys of the United States in their control over criminal prosecutions." 819 F2d at 1312 (internal quotation omitted); see also taRoucht v. Webster, 666 F$upp. 415, 417 (S.D.N.Y.1983) (holding that the separa- tion of powers prevents courts from interfer- ing in federal criminal investigations e