5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
a and Pacific 3% and the rest of the world 4%.45 \Z Sellers of the assets purchased by the SOF Funds were located in (by value) North America 43%, Western Europe 55% and the rest of the world 3%.46 The Manager expects to leverage non-monetary factors, such as confidentiality, trust, speed and certainty of e
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
a and Pacific 3% and the rest of the world 4%.45 \Z Sellers of the assets purchased by the SOF Funds were located in (by value) North America 43%, Western Europe 55% and the rest of the world 3%.46 The Manager expects to leverage non-monetary factors, such as confidentiality, trust, speed and certainty of e
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
a and Pacific 3% and the rest of the world 4%.45 \Z Sellers of the assets purchased by the SOF Funds were located in (by value) North America 43%, Western Europe 55% and the rest of the world 3%.46 The Manager expects to leverage non-monetary factors, such as confidentiality, trust, speed and certainty of e
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
a and Pacific 3% and the rest of the world 4%.45 \Z Sellers of the assets purchased by the SOF Funds were located in (by value) North America 43%, Western Europe 55% and the rest of the world 3%.46 The Manager expects to leverage non-monetary factors, such as confidentiality, trust, speed and certainty of e
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
a and Pacific 3% and the rest of the world 4%.45 \Z Sellers of the assets purchased by the SOF Funds were located in (by value) North America 43%, Western Europe 55% and the rest of the world 3%.46 The Manager expects to leverage non-monetary factors, such as confidentiality, trust, speed and certainty of e
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
Entities connected to both Western Europe and Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund

United States
LOCATION
North America
LOCATION
Julie K. Brown
PERSONGlendower
LOCATION
United Kingdom
LOCATION
Norway
LOCATION
Michael Douglas
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
Prince Charles
PERSON
Belgium
LOCATION
Finland
LOCATION
Hungary
LOCATION
Denmark
LOCATION
Luxembourg
LOCATION
Cyprus
LOCATION
Slovakia
LOCATION
European Union
ORGANIZATION
Czech Republic
LOCATION
Ireland
LOCATION
Advisory Board
ORGANIZATION