Epstein Secrets

the district court in the Does case also rejected Government efforts to dismiss the action. The district court

10) (emphasis added); see State ex rel. Thomas v. Klein, 150 P.3d 778, 780-81 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007) (noti

sonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government.” At least in the posture of this case (and we do

10) (emphasis added), see State ex rel. Thomas v. Klein, 150 P.3d 778, 780-81 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007) (noti

of a commercial nature whether they belong to the Government or the industrial lend- ing institutions connecte

Valley Indus. Inc., 527 F.2d at 93-94; Lamarr v. Klein, 35 A.D.2d 248, 315 N.Y.S.2d 695, 697-98 (st Dep’