Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
United States v. CFW Const. Co., 583 F. Supp. 197 (D. S.C. 1984) 23 United States v. Chacko, 169 F.3d 140 (2d Cir. 1999) 259 United States v. Chalmers, 474 F. Supp. 2d 555 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) 225, 226 United States v. Chambers, 800 F. App'x 43 (2d Cir. 2020) 69 United States v. Chan Lo, No. 14 Cr
sion of the statute. (Def. Mot. 2 at 6-7). The defendant's argument on this point is both misleading and unpersuasive. The defendant quotes Senator Patrick Leahy's comments on the 2003 conference committee report to the effect that "the conference agreed to drop language from the original House-passed bill th
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
United States v. CFW Const. Co., 583 F. Supp. 197 (D. S.C. 1984) 23 United States v. Chacko, 169 F.3d 140 (2d Cir. 1999) 259 United States v. Chalmers, 474 F. Supp. 2d 555 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) 225, 226 United States v. Chambers, 800 F. App'x 43 (2d Cir. 2020) 69 United States v. Chan Lo, No. 14 Cr
sion of the statute. (Def. Mot. 2 at 6-7). The defendant's argument on this point is both misleading and unpersuasive. The defendant quotes Senator Patrick Leahy's comments on the 2003 conference committee report to the effect that "the conference agreed to drop language from the original House-passed bill th
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
United States v. CFW Const. Co., 583 F. Supp. 197 (D. S.C. 1984) 23 United States v. Chacko, 169 F.3d 140 (2d Cir. 1999) 259 United States v. Chalmers, 474 F. Supp. 2d 555 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) 225, 226 United States v. Chambers, 800 F. App'x 43 (2d Cir. 2020) 69 United States v. Chan Lo, No. 14 Cr
sion of the statute. (Def. Mot. 2 at 6-7). The defendant's argument on this point is both misleading and unpersuasive. The defendant quotes Senator Patrick Leahy's comments on the 2003 conference committee report to the effect that "the conference agreed to drop language from the original House-passed bill th
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
United States v. CFW Const. Co., 583 F. Supp. 197 (D. S.C. 1984) 23 United States v. Chacko, 169 F.3d 140 (2d Cir. 1999) 259 United States v. Chalmers, 474 F. Supp. 2d 555 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) 225, 226 United States v. Chambers, 800 F. App'x 43 (2d Cir. 2020) 69 United States v. Chan Lo, No. 14 Cr
sion of the statute. (Def. Mot. 2 at 6-7). The defendant's argument on this point is both misleading and unpersuasive. The defendant quotes Senator Patrick Leahy's comments on the 2003 conference committee report to the effect that "the conference agreed to drop language from the original House-passed bill th
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (621)
Entities connected to both Chalmers and Patrick Leahy
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON35 w/ Chalmers·30 w/ Patrick
Michael Jackson
PERSON23 w/ Chalmers·18 w/ Patrick
Julie K. Brown
PERSON15 w/ Chalmers·20 w/ Patrick
George Mitchell
PERSON15 w/ Chalmers·19 w/ Patrick
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Chalmers·25 w/ Patrick
Prince Andrew
PERSON11 w/ Chalmers·23 w/ Patrick
Minnesota
LOCATION14 w/ Chalmers·19 w/ Patrick
Colorado
LOCATION11 w/ Chalmers·21 w/ Patrick
George W. Bush
PERSON10 w/ Chalmers·22 w/ Patrick
United States
LOCATION11 w/ Chalmers·21 w/ Patrick
Stephen Hawking
PERSON18 w/ Chalmers·13 w/ Patrick
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON14 w/ Chalmers·16 w/ Patrick
Michigan
LOCATION12 w/ Chalmers·18 w/ Patrick
Donald Trump
PERSON9 w/ Chalmers·21 w/ Patrick
Chris Tucker
PERSON14 w/ Chalmers·15 w/ Patrick
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON15 w/ Chalmers·14 w/ Patrick
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON14 w/ Chalmers·15 w/ Patrick
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Chalmers·17 w/ Patrick
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON10 w/ Chalmers·19 w/ Patrick
Oregon
LOCATION13 w/ Chalmers·15 w/ Patrick