Epstein Secrets

generation did, what the World War II generation did -- we're asking not to bankrupt our children and we've got a shambolic, dysfunctional process," Brooks said during an appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press." "Most of the blame still has to go to the Republicans," he continued. "They've had a brain free

days, little has been said about the gun lobby's increasingly pernicious role in judicial confirmations. In 2009, when President Obama chose Judge Sonia Sotomayor as his first Supreme Court nominee, the White House expected that her compelling personal story, sterling credentials, and experience both as a pros

One senator, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, said by way of explaining her "no" vote that her constituents had expressed "overwhelming concern"about Judge Sotomayor's views on the Second Amendment. However, Senator Murkowski told the National Journal at the time, "I am a bit concerned that the weighed in and s

/02, Main, Raju, et al.), The Daily Beast (09/02, Adams), Fox News (09/02, Elkind, Casiano, Ruiz), The Guardian (09/02, Anguiano), The Hill (09/02, Brooks, Lillis) (2), The Independent (09/02, Graziosi), NBC News (09/02, Uribe, Winter, et al.), NewsNation (09/02, Djordjevic), Newsweek (09/02, Whisnant)

y (09/02, Chambers, Garrison, et al.), Washington Examiner (09/02, Deese), Wall Street Journal (09/02, Li, Ferek), and Washington Post (09/02, Goba, Sotomayor, Goodwin). EFTA00163837 EFTA00163838 EFTA00163839 EFTA00163840 EFTA00163841 EFTA00163842 EFTA00163843 EFTA00163844 EFTA00163845 EF

president's claim of executive privilege. Politico (07/01, Carney), New York Times (07/01, Broadwater), CBS News (07/01, Yilek), the Hill (07/01, Brooks, Beitsch), Axios (07/01, Solender), National Review (07/01, Lynch), Roll Call (07/01, Tarinelli), CNN (07/01, Grayer), UPI (07/01, Benson), Huffingt

ocracy, asserting it was crucial for the presidency to function without fear of unwarranted legal repercussions. The articles explained that Justice Sonia Sotomayor, writing a strongly worded dissent joined by the other liberal justices, claimed the ruling effectively creates a "law-free zone" around the preside