Epstein Secrets

w if/ when you would like to discuss the note below. (& Would you like me to send you an overview report on the "names" suggested by Seth Lloyd and Scott Aaronson?) Allbest, Charles Harper Forwarded message From: Charles L. Harper Jr. Date: Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:12 AM Subject: Re: To: Jeffrey Epstein <j

mpared to the essay contests they have been doing. It is possible that the real reason was prudence to avoid FQX, already quite "controversial" via Templeton support to become even more so via Epstein-related sponsorship of prizes. If so, I think they their perspective is not unreasonable in view of their

w if/ when you would like to discuss the note below. (& Would you like me to send you an overview report on the "names" suggested by Seth Lloyd and Scott Aaronson?) Allbest, Charles Harper Forwarded message From: Charles L. Harper Jr.. Date: Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:12 AM Subject: Re: To: Jeffrey Epstein <

mpared to the essay contests they have been doing. It is possible that the real reason was prudence to avoid FQX, already quite "controversial" via Templeton support to become even more so via Epstein-related sponsorship of prizes. If so, I think they their perspective is not unreasonable in view of their

y, Your note from yesterday asked "next step?" The last time we spoke, you had suggested that you and I plan to meet up at MIT with Seth Lloyd and Scott Aaronson. I checked to see if we could rig a time convenient to all four schedules. This was not workable for the time frame you had suggested of early July

mpared to the essay contests they have been doing. It is possible that the real reason was prudence to avoid FQX, already quite "controversial" via Templeton support to become even more so via Epstein-related sponsorship of prizes. If so, I think they their perspective is not unreasonable in view of thei

[email protected]> Subject: Re: hi Jeffrey, Great to hear from you. I was just up at MIT this week and met with Seth Lloyd (on Wednesday) and Scott Aaronson (on Thursday) on the "Cryptography in Nature" small research conference project. These interactions were fantastic. Both think the topic is wonderf

mpared to the essay contests they have been doing. It is possible that the real reason was prudence to avoid FQX, already quite "controversial" via Templeton support to become even more so via Epstein-related sponsorship of prizes. If so, I think they their perspective is not unreasonable in view of their

5/29/2010 12:12:19 PM Subject: Re: hi Jeffrey, Great to hear from you. I was just up at MIT this week and met with Seth Lloyd (on Wednesday) and Scott Aaronson (on Thursday) on the "Cryptography in Nature" small research conference project. These interactions were fantastic. Both think the topic is wonderfu

mpared to the essay contests they have been doing. It is possible that the real reason was prudence to avoid FQX, already quite "controversial" via Templeton support to become even more so via Epstein- related sponsorship of prizes. If so, I think they their perspective is not unreasonable in view of thei