3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
eranto (which, he didn't realize, just uses standard Romance grammar with very minor changes)? Or better, why don't we all talk predicate calculus? Frege, Tarski, and others also thought that human language wasn't worth studying. One can even construct paradoxes in it. Quite a departure from a rich tr
talks. Best time for us would be the 16th. Have a talk at Harvard at noon, but free after that. Your computer guy reminds me of the first time I met Carnap. He couldn't understand why people talked languages, with all their irregularities and complexity. Why doesn't everyone just talk Esperanto (which,
eranto (which, he didn't realize, just uses standard Romance grammar with very minor changes)? Or better, why don't we all talk predicate calculus? Frege, Tarski, and others also thought that human language wasn't worth studying. One can even construct paradoxes in it. Quite a departure from a rich tr
talks. Best time for us would be the 16th. Have a talk at Harvard at noon, but free after that. Your computer guy reminds me of the first time I met Carnap. He couldn't understand why people talked languages, with all their irregularities and complexity. Why doesn't everyone just talk Esperanto (which,
o (which, he didn =80 t realize, just uses standard Romance grammar with very minor changes=? Or better, why don't we all talk predicate calculus? Frege, Tarski, and others also thought that human language wasn't w=rth studying. One can even construct paradoxes in it. Quite a depart=re from a rich tr
talks. Best =ime for us would be the 16th. Have a talk at Harvard at n=on, but free after that. Your computer guy reminds me of the f=rst time I met Carnap. He couldn't understand why people tal=ed languages, with all their irregularities and complexity. Why doesn't everyone just talk Esperanto (which,
Entities connected to both Frege and Carnap