Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
so suggests that Mr. Epstein poses "ongoing and forward-looking danger." ass Dkt. 11 at 10; see also Baker 349 F. Supp. 3d at 1135; United States v. Goodwin 2015 WL 6386568, at '3 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 21, 2015). • The § 1591 Presumption Of Pretrial Remand Reflects The Seriousness Of Mr. Epstein's Alleged Cr
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
lso suggests that Mr. Epstein poses "ongoing and forward-looking danger." kg Dkt. 11 at 10; see also Baker 349 F. Supp. 3d at 1135; United States v. Goodwin, 2015 WL 6386568, at '3 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 21, 2015). • The § 1591 Presumption Of Pretrial Remand Reflects The Seriousness Of Mr. Epstein's Alleged C
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
lso suggests that Mr. Epstein poses "ongoing and forward-looking danger." kg Dkt. 11 at 10; see also Baker 349 F. Supp. 3d at 1135; United States v. Goodwin, 2015 WL 6386568, at '3 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 21, 2015). • The § 1591 Presumption Of Pretrial Remand Reflects The Seriousness Of Mr. Epstein's Alleged C
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
lso suggests that Mr. Epstein poses "ongoing and forward-looking danger." kg Dkt. 11 at 10; see also Baker 349 F. Supp. 3d at 1135; United States v. Goodwin, 2015 WL 6386568, at '3 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 21, 2015). • The § 1591 Presumption Of Pretrial Remand Reflects The Seriousness Of Mr. Epstein's Alleged C
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (88)
Entities connected to both Goodwin and Interstate Facilities
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON59 w/ Goodwin·4 w/ Interstate
United States
LOCATION32 w/ Goodwin·4 w/ Interstate
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION28 w/ Goodwin·4 w/ Interstate
Julie K. Brown
PERSON25 w/ Goodwin·4 w/ Interstate
Michael Jackson
PERSON25 w/ Goodwin·4 w/ Interstate
New York
LOCATION23 w/ Goodwin·4 w/ Interstate
The New York Post
ORGANIZATION23 w/ Goodwin·4 w/ Interstate
Bradley Edwards
PERSON20 w/ Goodwin·4 w/ Interstate
George Mitchell
PERSON20 w/ Goodwin·4 w/ Interstate
James Baker
PERSON16 w/ Goodwin·4 w/ Interstate
Oliver Stone
PERSON15 w/ Goodwin·4 w/ Interstate
the Southern District
LOCATION14 w/ Goodwin·4 w/ Interstate
David Boies
PERSON15 w/ Goodwin·3 w/ Interstate
New York City
LOCATION12 w/ Goodwin·4 w/ Interstate
Palm Beach
LOCATION11 w/ Goodwin·4 w/ Interstate
Singh
PERSON11 w/ Goodwin·4 w/ Interstate
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Goodwin·4 w/ Interstate
Jes Staley
PERSON11 w/ Goodwin·3 w/ Interstate
Contreras
PERSON10 w/ Goodwin·4 w/ Interstate
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION9 w/ Goodwin·4 w/ Interstate