Epstein Secrets

limitation, specifically arising out of that certain incident described more particularly in Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Counterclaim filed in the Action entitled JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. SCOT?' ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY'. EDWARDS, individually, Case No. 502009CA040800,OOOCMB-AG, pending in the

(2) that party has recovered a judgment ...less than the ... offer.' Levine v. Harris, 791 So. 2d 1175, 1177 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(citing Schmidt v. Fortner, 629 So. 2d 1036,1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Likewise, pursuant to this statute, "once an offer of judgment has been made and rejected and a judgment

limitation, specifically arising out of that certain incident described more particularly in Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs Counterclaim filed in the Action entitled JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. SCOTT R0THSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Case No. 502009CA040800)OOaM13-AO, pending in the

(2) that party has recovered a judgment ...less than the ... offer.'" Levine v. Harris, 791 So. 2d 1175, 1177 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001Xciting Schmidt v. Fortner, 629 So. 2d 1036,1040 (Ha. 4th DCA 1993). Likewise, pursuant to this statute, "once an offer of judgment has been made and rejected and a judgment

inated on the record by agreement of the parties and Intervenors or by order of the Court. 19. Within sixty (60) days after the conclusion of this Action, whether by judgment, settlement or otherwise, including conclusion of any appeal, all CDM including but not limited to materials furnished to cons

4facebookocenfarmerJaffetAleissing eag EFTA00191313 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 247-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/02/2014 Page 6 of 12 922014 Fortner JAN81%10.21622 SPX Wonder Jeffrey roma solved 13 monies in ;Moot. 2007 for rotenone motion ogle. Um • Cowen • Share Mid. Me lies Um. r Fame r Ja