Epstein Secrets

defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Lesley Groff ("Defendants") in the above- referenced lawsuit ("Action"). The Defendants intend to move to dismiss the Action based on, inter alia, the failure of Jane Doe 43 ("Plaintiff") to establish personal jurisdiction over the Defendants ("Motion to Dismiss"). The Pl

on she was denoted in another atter pending in this District During that deposition, Plaintiff gave sworn testimony and produced documents i.e. the Plaintiff's Evidence. Mr. Epstein, through his counsel, as a non- party witness in the action, was provided with a copy of the Plaintiff's Evidence. These materials wer

in your letter to Judge Koeltl as follows: "We respectfully submit that the Plaintiff's Evidence provides grounds for this Court to dispose of the Action entirely, inter alia, under Rule 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction. Because the Defendants have no present connection to New York upon whi

ave a basis for alleging jurisdiction in New York. Specifically you stated in your letter to Judge Koeltl as follows: "We respectfully submit that the Plaintiff's Evidence provides grounds for this Court to dispose of the Action entirely, inter alia, under Rule 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction. Because the D

We represent defendants Jeffrey Epstein and ("Defendants") in the above- referenced lawsuit ("Action"). The Defendants intend to move to dismiss the Action based on, inter alia, the failure of Jane Doe 43 ("Plaintiff") to establish personal jurisdiction over the Defendants ("Motion to Dismiss"). The Pl

uments, i.e., the Plaintiff's Evidence. Mr. Epstein, through his counsel, as a non-party witness in the Giuffre action, was provided with a copy of the Plaintiff's Evidence. These materials were marked "Confidential" pursuant to the Protective Order in that case.' Under the terms of the Protective Order, "Confidential"

in your letter to Judge Koeltl as follows: "We respectfully submit that the Plaintiff's Evidence provides grounds for this Court to dispose of the Action entirely, inter alia, under Rule 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction. Because the Defendants have no present connection to New York upon whi

ave a basis for alleging jurisdiction in New York. Specifically you stated in your letter to Judge Koeltl as follows: "We respectfully submit that the Plaintiff's Evidence provides grounds for this Court to dispose of the Action entirely, inter alia, under Rule 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction. Because the D