Epstein Secrets

limitation, specifically arising out of that certain incident described more particularly in Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Counterclaim filed in the Action entitled JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. SCO7T ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Individually, Case No 502009CA040800)OCOCMB-AG, pending in the C

P. 1.442: 1. This Proposal is being made pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442. 2. This Proposal is being made on behalf of Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. 3. This Proposal is being made to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. 4. This Proposal is directed

limitation, specifically arising out of that certain incident described more particularly in Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Counterclaim filed in the Action entitled JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. SCOT?' ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY'. EDWARDS, individually, Case No. 502009CA040800,OOOCMB-AG, pending in the

P. 1.442: 1. This Proposal is being made pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442. 2. This Proposal is being made on behalf of Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. 3. This Proposal is being made to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. 4, This Proposal is directed

limitation, specifically arising out of that certain incident described more particularly in Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs Counterclaim filed in the Action entitled JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J EDWARDS, individually, Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB-AG, pending in the Ci

P. 1.442: 1. This Proposal is being made pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442. 2. This Proposal is being made on behalf of Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. 3. This Proposal is being made to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. 4. This Proposal is directed

limitation, specifically arising out of that certain incident described more particularly in Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs Counterclaim filed in the Action entitled JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. SCOTT R0THSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Case No. 502009CA040800)OOaM13-AO, pending in the

. P. 1.442: 1. This Proposal is being made pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla R. Civ. P. 1.442. 2. This Proposal is being made on behalf of Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. 3. This Proposal is being made to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. 4. This Proposal is directed

limitation, specifically arising out of that certain incident described more particularly in Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Counterclaim filed in the Action entitled JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. SCO7T ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Individually, Case No 502009CA040800)OCOCMB-AG, pending in the C

P. 1.442: 1. This Proposal is being made pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442. 2. This Proposal is being made on behalf of Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. 3. This Proposal is being made to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. 4. This Proposal is directed