Epstein Secrets

ng of motions and a brief by the Guardian in appellate proceedings conflicts with these functions, and violates the statutory prohibi- tion against Guardians acting as advocates. See§ 61.403 Fla. Stat. (1997); Scaringe v. Herrick, 711 So.2d at 204. Simply, the Guardian does not have a statutory right to

lude the moving party's likelihood of success on the merits, and the likelihood of harm should a stay not be granted. See Stale tuc rel. Price v. McCord, 380 So.2d 1037 (Fla.1980). During the course of the trial court pro- ceedings, the children had been spending the summer with the Former Husband

ng of motions and a brief by the Guardian in appellate proceedings conflicts with these functions, and violates the statutory prohibi- tion against Guardians acting as advocates. See§ 1.403 Fla. Stat. (1997); Scaringe v. Herrick, 711 Eld at 204. Simply, the Guardian does not have a statutory right to ap

clude the moving party's likelihood of success on the merits, and the likelihood of harm should a stay not be granted. See State ex rel. Price v. McCord, 380 1.2d 1037 (Fla.1980). During the course of the trial court pro- ceedings, the children had been spending the summer with the Former Husband p

ng of motions and a brief by the Guardian in appellate proceedings conflicts with these functions, and violates the statutory prohibi- tion against Guardians acting as advocates. See§ 61.403 Fla. Stat. (1997); Scaringe v. Herrick. 711 So.2d at 204. Simply, the Guardian does not have a statutory right to

clude the moving party's likelihood of success on the merits, and the likelihood of harm should a stay not be granted. See State ex rel. Price v. McCord, 380 So.2d 1037 (Fla.1980). During the course of the trial court pro- ceedings, the children had been spending the summer with the Former Husband