8
Shared Docs
8
Same-Page
14 / 8
Mentions
ia, which was a se=urity/personnel investigation relating to its own personnel, they agreed t= share anything relevant to White House personnel with the White House.Q The USSS did not share any of its own investigative work product with the White House (i.e., interview memor=nda), which is standard and appropri
and confronted him with the hotel log. Dach continued to de=y having a guest in his room, and his denials were deemed credible. <1=> 4, (3) The White Hou=e was aware of no information corroborating the hotel log, and it was awar= that on at least one other occasion, the USSS had determined that a simi
factual context for your story. If you have specific questions after reviewing this =aterial, would you please send them to me by email? <1=> The Comprehensivene=s of the Review: <1=> On the morning of Apri= 20, 2012, the USSS informed the White House that an individual asso=iated with the White House advan
ia, which was a se=urity/personnel investigation relating to its own personnel, they agreed t= share anything relevant to White House personnel with the White House.Q The USSS did not share any of its own investigative work product with the White House (i.e., interview memor=nda), which is standard and appropri
d Dach and confronted him with the hotel log. Dach continued to de=y having a guest in his room, and his denials were deemed credible. Q (3) The White Hou=e was aware of no information corroborating the hotel log, and it was awar= that on at least one other occasion, the USSS had determined that a simi
factual context for your story. If you have specific questions after reviewing this =aterial, would you please send them to me by email? </=> The Comprehensivene=s of the Review: </=> On the morning of Apri= 20, 2012, the USSS informed the White House that an individual asso=iated with the White House advan
d t= share anything relevant to White House personnel with the White House.40 The USSS did not share any of its own investigative work product with the White House (i.e., interview memor=nda), which is standard and appropriate protocol. -- The White House Counsel's office collected and evaluated a=l of the evid
and confronted him with the hotel log. Dach continued to de=y having a guest in his room, and his denials were deemed credible. </=> 40 (3) The White Hou=e was aware of no information corroborating the hotel log, and it was awar= that on at least one other occasion, the USSS had determined that a simi
you have specific questions after reviewing this =aterial, would you please send them to me by email? < / = > EFTA_R1_01649726 EFTA02515402 The Comprehensivene=s of the Review: <1=> On the morning of Apri= 20, 2012, the USSS informed the White House that an individual asso=iated with the White House advan
d t= share anything relevant to White House personnel with the White House.40 The USSS did not share any of its own investigative work product with the White House (i.e., interview memor=nda), which is standard and appropriate protocol. -- The White House Counsel's office collected and evaluated a=l of the evid
and confronted him with the hotel log. Dach continued to de=y having a guest in his room, and his denials were deemed credible. </=> 4> (3) The White Hou=e was aware of no information corroborating the hotel log, and it was awar= that on at least one other occasion, the USSS had determined that a simi
factual context for your story. If you have specific questions after reviewing this =aterial, would you please send them to me by email? </=> The Comprehensivene=s of the Review: </=> On the morning of Apri= 20, 2012, the USSS informed the White House that an individual asso=iated with the White House advan
t= share anything relevant to White House personnel with the White House...A0 The USSS did not share any of its own investigative work product with the White House (i.e., interview memor=nda), which is standard and appropriate protocol. -- The White House Counsel's office collected and evaluated a=l of the evid
and confronted him with the hotel log. Dach continued to de=y having a guest in his room, and his denials were deemed credible. <1=> 40 (3) The White Hou=e was aware of no information corroborating the hotel log, and it was awar= that on at least one other occasion, the USSS had determined that a simi
r factual context for your story. If you have specific questions after reviewing this =aterial, would you please send them to me by email? <fa The Comprehensivene=s of the Review: </=> On the morning of Apri= 20, 2012, the USSS informed the White House that an individual asso=iated with the White House advan
a, which was a se=urity/personnel investigation relating to its own personnel, they agreed t= share anything relevant to White House personnel with the White House.4, The USSS did not share any of its own investigative work product with the White House (i.e., interview memor=nda), which is standard and appropria
and confronted him with the hotel log. Dach continued to de=y having a guest in his room, and his denials were deemed credible. <1=> 4> (3) The White Hou=e was aware of no information corroborating the hotel log, and it was awar= that on at least one other occasion, the USSS had determined that a simi
factual context for your story. If you have specific questions after reviewing this =aterial, would you please send them to me by email? </=> The Comprehensivene=s of the Review: </=> On the morning of Apri= 20, 2012, the USSS informed the White House that an individual asso=iated with the White House advan
the=USSS and to do so thoroughly and expeditiously: --every person who went on the trip was separately interviewed regardless o= whether they were White House employees or volunteers, including Dach;=/u> 2 EFTA_R1_01649636 EFTA02515331 --e-mails, hotel manifests, and any other relevant information in t
factual context for your story. If you have specific questions after reviewing this =aterial, would you please send them to me by email? </=> The Comprehensivene=s of the Review: </=> On the morning of Apri= 20, 2012, the USSS informed the White House that an individual asso=iated with the White House advan
denied bringing a guest to his room. Dach agreed to be inter=iewed and answer questions, even though he was under no legal obligation t= do so, and the White House had no legal authority to compel him to answer the questions. -- As the USSS was conducting the investigation in Columbia, which was a se=urity/pers
r factual context for your story. If you have specific questions after reviewing this =aterial, would you please send them to me by email? </a The Comprehensivene=s of the Review: </a On the morning of Apri= 20, 2012, the USSS informed the White House that an individual asso=iated with the White House advanc
Entities connected to both White House and Comprehensivene

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Columbia University
LOCATION
Kathryn Ruemmler
PERSONCarol
PERSON
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
ORGANIZATIONJay Carney
PERSON
Cartagena
PERSON
Lieberman
PERSON
Darrell Issa
PERSONthe White House Counsel's
ORGANIZATIONWhite House Interference
ORGANIZATIONthe DHS Inspector General
ORGANIZATIONJonathan Dach's
PERSON
Department of Defense
ORGANIZATIONWhite House Communications Agency
ORGANIZATIONDHS Inspector
ORGANIZATIONmemor=nda
ORGANIZATION