Epstein Secrets

e the probability of the outcome of this matter or the range of reasonably possible loss, if any. On August 18, 2001, a group of truck drivers from Safeway's Tracy, California distribution center filed an action in California Superior Court, San Joaquin County entitled Cicairos, et al v Summit Logistics

inaccurately represented on its home delivery website that the prices paid there were the same as the prices in the brick-and-mortar retail store. Rodman asserted claims for breath of contract and unfair business practices under California law. The court certified a class for the breach of contract cl

rial court for recalculation of damages. On February 25, 2010, the trial court entered a judgment in favor of Newman in the amount of $18.5 million. Safeway appealed, and on March 18, 2011, the appellate court held that Safeway had waived its right to appeal. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court vacated this o

a Supreme Court declined to hear Safeway's appeal on June 24, 2015. In early July 2015, the Company paid the judgment, and the matter is concluded. Rodman: On June 17, 2011, a customer of Safeway's home delivery business (safeway.com) filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court f

Amendment No. 3 to Form S-1 Table of Contents AB ACQUISITION LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements against Safeway. After lengthy litigation in the trial and appellate courts, both cases were certified as class actions and assigned to a single judge for all purpo

fees and entry of judgment. At this time, the Company does not believe that financial exposure to loss in excess of the amount accrued is probable. Rodman: On June 17, 2011, a customer of Safeway's home delivery business (safeway.com) filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court f