Epstein Secrets

f law were sufficient where thay were "clear, supported by the record, and sufficiently detailed to permit intelligent appellate review"); People v. Belzer, 84 A.D.3d 905, 906 (2d Dept. 2011)(`While a SORA determination should be supported by findings of fact, there is no need for a court to make gratu

DEBORAH'. MORSE ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEYS Of Counsel EFTA00602338 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ii INTRODUCTION 1 POINT THE SORA COURT'S DESIGNATION OF DEFENDANT AS A LEVEL-THREE OFFENDER WAS SUPPORTED OVERWHELMINGLY BY THE RECORD. THE PROCESS BY WHICH THE COURT REACHED AND DELIVER

f law were sufficient where thay were "clear, supported by the record, and sufficiently detailed to permit intelligent appellate review"); People v. Belzer, 84 A.D.3d 905, 906 (2d Dept. 2011)(`While a SORA determination should be supported by findings of fact, there is no need for a court to make gratu

DEBORAH L MORSE ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEYS Of Counsel EFTA00792500 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ii INTRODUCTION 1 POINT THE SORA COURT'S DESIGNATION OF DEFENDANT AS A LEVEL-THREE OFFENDER WAS SUPPORTED OVERWHELMINGLY BY THE RECORD. THE PROCESS BY WHICH THE COURT REACHED AND DELIVER

f law were sufficient where thay were "clear, supported by the record, and sufficiently detailed to permit intelligent appellate review"); people v. Belzer, 84 A.D.3d 905, 906 (2d Dept. 2011)(While a SORA determination should be supported by findings of fact, there is no need for a court to make gratui

EBORA!! L MORSE ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEYS Of Counsel EFTA00181147 TABLE OF CONTENTS if' g TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ii INTRODUCTION 1 POINT THE SORA COURT'S DESIGNATION OF DEFENDANT AS A LEVEL-THREE OFFENDER WAS SUPPORTED OVERWHELMINGLY BY THE RECORD. THE PROCESS BY WHICH THE COURT REACHED AND DELIVER