Epstein Secrets

f law were sufficient where thay were "clear, supported by the record, and sufficiently detailed to permit intelligent appellate review"); People v. Belzer, 84 A.D.3d 905, 906 (2d Dept. 2011)(`While a SORA determination should be supported by findings of fact, there is no need for a court to make gratu

uments dated fully two years apart. The People's evidence on remand would include proof that defendant had engaged in aggressive negotiations with the Palm Beach State's Attorney's Office even before indictment; that, after the State's Attorney's Office obtained a single-count indictment, Florida federal authorities

f law were sufficient where thay were "clear, supported by the record, and sufficiently detailed to permit intelligent appellate review"); People v. Belzer, 84 A.D.3d 905, 906 (2d Dept. 2011)(`While a SORA determination should be supported by findings of fact, there is no need for a court to make gratu

uments dated fully two years apart. The People's evidence on remand would include proof that defendant had engaged in aggressive negotiations with the Palm Beach State's Attorney's Office even before indictment; that, after the State's Attorney's Office obtained a single-count indictment, Florida federal authorities

f law were sufficient where thay were "clear, supported by the record, and sufficiently detailed to permit intelligent appellate review"); people v. Belzer, 84 A.D.3d 905, 906 (2d Dept. 2011)(While a SORA determination should be supported by findings of fact, there is no need for a court to make gratui

uments dated fully two years apart. The People's evidence on remand would include proof that defendant had engaged in aggressive negotiations with the Palm Beach State's Attorney's Office even before indictment; that, after the State's Attorney's Office obtained a single-count indictment, Florida federal authorities