Epstein Secrets

u.s _ ems •wr ar . l'n-, r tr.S. '‘.e.._,....,t4's"- :‘-11; "t''st ;$....iA cf.. s. ' -,., -,s.v,:e isttif:ot e. lit F .i. 2.‘" -ci v. Phillips, 165 Fed. Appx. 677 (10ih Cir. 2006) Unpublished No discussion of facility but appears to be phone No specific information available other t

ding the distribution of narcotics, use of force and possession of firearms were present. See U.S. v. Evans, 476 F.3d 1176 (11th Cir. 2007); U.S. v. Phillips, 165 Fed. Appx. 677 (10th Cir. 2006). In addition, the telephone and not the Internet served as the "facility or instrument" of interstate commerce

U.S. v. Pisman, 443 F.3d 912 (sr Cir. 2006) (2423(b) conspiracy); U.S. v. Pipkins, et al., 378 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004) (RICO conspiracy); U.S. v. Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (11`" Cir. 2004) (conspiracy charge was error); EFTA00079414 U.S. v. Jackson. 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33639 (D. Neb. 2007) (state con

include violence, distribution of rcotics, T use of force and possession of firearms and the like. . Evans, 476 F.3d 1176 (11th Cir. 2007); U.S. Phillips, 165 Fed. Appx. 677 (10th Cir. 2006). The only of er ins ce where the telephone provided the sole basis for a charge under 2422(b) presented a situ

r error. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 55 EFTA00226341 COURT . CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE ***U.S. I Hornaday, Internet Internet chat room "Loving Families" 2422(6); 392 F.3d 1306 (11th Cir. 2004) Sting where people communicate about having sex with c

.g., U.S. Pisman, 443 F.3d 912 (7th Cir. 2006) (2423(b) conspiracy); U.S. Pipkins, es al., 378 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004 (RICO conspiracy); U.S. Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (1 1 th Cir. 2 4) (conspiracy charge was error); U.S. I Jackson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33639 (D. Neb. 2007) (state conspiracy charge

cases include violence, distribution of rircotics, use of force and possession of firearms and the like. ns, 476 F.3d 1176 (11th Cir. 2007); US. Phillips, 165 Fed. Appx. 677 (10th Cir. 2006). The only o er instance where the telephone provided the sole basis for a charge under 2422(b) presented a situ

., U.S. I Pisman, 443 F.3d 912 (7th Cir. 2006) (2423(b) conspiracy); U.S Pipkins, et al., 378 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004) (RICO conspiracy); U.S. ~ Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (1 1 `11 Cir. 2004) (conspiracy charge was error); U.S. I. Jackson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 336 9 (D. Neb. 2007) (state conspiracy char

5 , , d • ', •"„ 1 4 , • tWlibia.,rs tj '51 ltAMe m psi , O _ , i.:•. t -..it, • '',...‘ t v ye. .. ' toemt ...t.' ":1t; e ' U.S. v. Phillips, 165 Fed. Appx. 677 (10'1' Unpublished No discussion of No specific information available other than the fact that the case involved a 2422(b)

U.S. v. Pisman, 443 F.3d 912 (76 Cir. 2006) (2423(b) Conspiracy); U.S. v. Pipkins, et al., 378 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004) (RICO conspiracy); U.S. v. Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (11" Cir. 2004) (conspiracy charge was error); EFTA01729485 U.S. v. Jackson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33639 (D. Neb. 2007) (state cons