Epstein Secrets

and constitutional principles and is essential to protect USS. interests abroad.”). 3 Td, at 2-3. 15 US.C. §§ 78dd-1(a), 78dd-2(a), 78dd-3 (a). % See H.R. Rep. No. 95-831, at 12 (referring to “business purpose” test). 66 See, Cs Complaint, SEC v. Siemens AG, supra note 48; Criminal Information, United S

at 4 (1977) [hereinafter S. Rep. No. 95-114], available at http ://www.justice.gov/' criminal/fraud/ fcpa/ history/ 1977/ senaterpt-95-114.pdf. * Id; H.R. Rep. No. 95-640, at 4-5 (1977) [hereinafter H. R. Rep. No. 95-640], available at http ://www.justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/ history/1977/houseprt-9

and Non-Prosecution (May 25, 2010), available at http ://www.justice.gov/ dag/ dag-memo-guidance- monitors.pdf; Lanny A. Breuer, Assist. Att’y Gen., Dept of Justice, Mem. to All Criminal Division Personnel on Selection of Monitors in Criminal Division Matters (June 24, 2009), available at hetp:/ /www. justice.gov

ic to know and the need of the [g]overnment to keep information in confidence." John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp.,493 U.S. 146, 152 (1989) (quoting H.R. Rep. No. 89-147 at 6 (1966), reprinted in 1966 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2418, 2423)). The nine FOIA exemptions reflect Congress's determination that "public di

Y. Mar. 24, 2014) 22, 23 Crooke,- v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, 789 F.2d 64 (D.C. Cir. 1986) 8 Cut for Nall Sec. Studies v. U.S. Dept of Justice, 331 F.3d 918 (D.C. Cir. 2003) 8 DOD v. FLRA, 510 U.S. 487(1994) 18 Doherty v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 775 F.2d 49 (2d Cir. 1985) 20 Eil v. U

ic to know and the need of the [g]overnment to keep information in confidence." John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp.,493 U.S. 146, 152 (1989) (quoting H.R. Rep. No. 89-147 at 6 (1966), reprinted in 1966 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2418, 2423)). The nine FOIA exemptions reflect Congress's determination that "public di

Y. Mar. 24, 2014) 22, 23 Crooke,- v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, 789 F.2d 64 (D.C. Cir. 1986) 8 Cut for Nall Sec. Studies v. U.S. Dept of Justice, 331 F.3d 918 (D.C. Cir. 2003) 8 DOD v. FLRA, 510 U.S. 487(1994) 18 Doherty v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 775 F.2d 49 (2d Cir. 1985) 20 Eil v. U

ic to know and the need of the [g]overnment to keep information in confidence." John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp.,493 U.S. 146, 152 (1989) (quoting H.R. Rep. No. 89-147 at 6 (1966), reprinted in 1966 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2418, 2423)). The nine FOIA exemptions reflect Congress's determination that "public di

Y. Mar. 24, 2014) 22, 23 Crooke,- v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, 789 F.2d 64 (D.C. Cir. 1986) 8 Cut for Nall Sec. Studies v. U.S. Dept of Justice, 331 F.3d 918 (D.C. Cir. 2003) 8 DOD v. FLRA, 510 U.S. 487(1994) 18 Doherty v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 775 F.2d 49 (2d Cir. 1985) 20 Eil v. U