Epstein Secrets

ed interstate commerce.” When Life magazine ran a favorable profile of me in 1968, an FBI agent sent a poison-pen letter to the editor: “To classify Krassner as some sort of ‘social rebel’ is far too cute. He's a nut, a raving, unconfined nut.” But in 1969, the FBI's previous attempt at mere character assa

hat LA. 7imes Sunday Calendar section blared out: Paul Krassner-- “1 Was a Communist for the FBI.” \|n the San Fr

provide the funds to cover the FBI’ s theater critics squad? The banner headline on the cover of that LA. 7imes Sunday Calendar section blared out: Paul Krassner-- “1 Was a Communist for the FBI.” \|n the San Francisco Chronicle columnist Herb Caen wrote, “Fearing Krassner would sue, the 7imes recalled and destr

facetious suggestion, didn't we?” HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015435 On top of that, my name was on a list of sixty-five “radical” campus speakers, released by the House Internal Security Committee. The blacklist was published in the New York Times, and picked up by newspapers across the country. It might have been a coincidence, but my campus

sixty-five “radical” campus speakers, released by the House Internal Security Committee. The blacklist was published in the New York Time

had been fun—like the issue with only the one large red headline on the Caval/iercover: “BEAT ‘EM SENSELESS FIRST” —THE FREE SPEECH CONTROVERSY, BY PAUL KRASSNER... At the University of California in Berkeley on September 1964, Dean Katherine Towle banned posters, easels and tables at the Bancroft-Telegraph S

LESS FIRST” —THE FREE SPEECH CONTROVERSY, BY PAUL KRASSNER... At the University of California in Berkeley o

ixty-five “radical’’ campus speakers, released by the House Internal Security Committee. The blacklist was published in the New York Time

it had been fun—like the issue with only the one large red headline on the Cavalier cover: “BEAT ‘EM SENSELESS FIRST’—THE FREE SPEECH CONTROVERSY, BY PAUL KRASSNER ... “Ironically,” I wrote, “it is this concept of the total education experience on campus which I believe to be the basic significance of the much-

ELESS FIRST’—THE FREE SPEECH CONTROVERSY, BY PAUL KRASSNER ... “Ironically,” I wrote, “it is this concept of

sixty-five “radical” campus speakers, released by the House Internal Security Committee. The blacklist was published in the New York Time

sner [ie Sent: 5/15/2019 12:17:32 AM To: George Krassner |S : nick kazan |); Vrisman02 i Rebecca Risman [i

it had been fun—like the issue with only the one large red headline on the Cavalier cover: “BEAT ‘EM SENSELESS FIRST”—THE FREE SPEECH CONTROVERSY, BY PAUL KRASSNER .. . “Ironically,” I wrote, “it is this concept of the total education experience on campus which I believe to be the basic significance of the much-