Epstein Secrets

k BY: Assistant United States Attorneys Martin G. Weinberg, PC Attorney for Defendant Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) Attorneys for Defendant BY: REID WEINGARTEN MARC FERNICH Attorney for Defendant JAMES BROCHIN Attorney for Defendant JOSEPH JAFFE Attorney for Defendant SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.

light in a moment. We've asked for home detention. We've asked for the visiting list to be approved by pretrial, meaning almost nobody except Mr. Weingarten and myself, Mr. Fernich, lawyers on our defense team. We would rip out the cell phones. There is one line. We consent to the monitoring of that li

nswer is yes? MR. BOIES: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Go ahead. MR. : Your Honor, my understanding, including from representatives of the Boies, Schiller law firm, is that victims have expressed the views that we conveyed to the Court. I was not aware of any victims or victims' counsel who wished t

k BY: Assistant United States Attorneys Martin G. Weinberg, PC Attorney for Defendant Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) Attorneys for Defendant BY: REID WEINGARTEN MARC FERNICH Attorney for Defendant JAMES BROCHIN Attorney for Defendant JOSEPH JAFFE Attorney for Defendant SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.

light in a moment. We've asked for home detention. We've asked for the visiting list to be approved by pretrial, meaning almost nobody except Mr. Weingarten and myself, Mr. Fernich, lawyers on our defense team. We would rip out the cell phones. There is one line. We consent to the monitoring of that li

nswer is yes? MR. BOIES: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Go ahead. MR. : Your Honor, my understanding, including from representatives of the Boies, Schiller law firm, is that victims have expressed the views that we conveyed to the Court. I was not aware of any victims or victims' counsel who wished t

ESDA D S EAKINS LOVE 300 LLC WEINGARTEN,BERNARD DRAKE,RODMAN L HEPBURN,TED

ALLEN,JOSEPH FISHER,MARJORIE S SCHELLER,DR ZBIGNIEW PAGLIARI,RICHARD A KIER

non v. Cassadaga Valley Cent. School Dist., 49 F.3d 886 (2d Cir. 1995) 42, 43 xxiv EFTA00099965 Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997) Weingarten v. United States, 865 F.3d 48 (2d Cir. 2017). Zafiro v. United States, 506 U.S. 534 (1993) 151 passim 209,210,220 Zicarelli v. Dietz, 633 F.2

r 18, 2018. Shortly thereafter, in or about December or January 2018, the Government indicated to at I that it intended to make document requests. Schiller generally advised the Government that a protective order would govern some of the materials. (Id. at 3). In or about February 2019, approximately t

2005) 155 Vernon v. Cassadaga Valley Cent. School Dist., 49 F.3d 886 (2d Cir. 1995) 32, 33 Washington v. Giucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997) 104 Weingarten v. United States, 865 F.3d 48 (2d Cir. 2017) passim Zafiro v. United States, 506 U.S. 534 (1993) 140, 147 Zicarelli v. Dietz, 633 F.2d 312 (3d

bpoenas and Ex Pane Applications for Materials SOW- after opening t mment identified possible victims and their counsel trroiigh ich ina Boies Schiller. (Def. Mem. 3, Ex. E at 2-3). SDNY first cont oies Schiller about its investigation on or about December 18, 2018. Shortly thereafter, in oar Dec