Epstein Secrets

k BY: Assistant United States Attorneys Martin G. Weinberg, PC Attorney for Defendant Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) Attorneys for Defendant BY: REID WEINGARTEN MARC FERNICH Attorney for Defendant JAMES BROCHIN Attorney for Defendant JOSEPH JAFFE Attorney for Defendant SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.

light in a moment. We've asked for home detention. We've asked for the visiting list to be approved by pretrial, meaning almost nobody except Mr. Weingarten and myself, Mr. Fernich, lawyers on our defense team. We would rip out the cell phones. There is one line. We consent to the monitoring of that li

he Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders New York state and then in state court by the courts and, particularly, a decision of the Honorable Justice Ruth Pickholz on our about January 18, 2011. I believe that decision was appealed to the New York State Appellate Division and was unanimously upheld. I read th

to the New York State Appellate Division and was unanimously upheld. I read this morning a copy of the transcript of the proceedings before Judge Pickholz which I'm likely to place on the docket after today's session. And the question is for each side. First of all, they're free to comment on my descr

k BY: Assistant United States Attorneys Martin G. Weinberg, PC Attorney for Defendant Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) Attorneys for Defendant BY: REID WEINGARTEN MARC FERNICH Attorney for Defendant JAMES BROCHIN Attorney for Defendant JOSEPH JAFFE Attorney for Defendant SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.

light in a moment. We've asked for home detention. We've asked for the visiting list to be approved by pretrial, meaning almost nobody except Mr. Weingarten and myself, Mr. Fernich, lawyers on our defense team. We would rip out the cell phones. There is one line. We consent to the monitoring of that li

to the New York State Appellate Division and was unanimously upheld. I read this morning a copy of the transcript of the proceedings before Judge Pickholz which I'm likely to place on the docket after today's session. And the question is for each side. First of all, they're free to comment on my descr

he Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders New York state and then in state court by the courts and, particularly, a decision of the Honorable Justice Ruth Pickholz on our about January 18, 2011. I believe that decision was appealed to the New York State Appellate Division and was unanimously upheld. I read th

l Campion Miller, Michael Gerard Scavelli, Reid Weingarten, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Marc Allan Fernich, Law

decision of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders and achieve a downward modification of Mr. Epstein's sex offender status. Id. at 2-15. Judge Pickholz appeared to be stunned by the joint Defense Counsel/District Attor- ney application, stating: "I am just a little overwhelmed that the People are m

llowed Mr. Epstein to avoid his reporting obligations. In a Sex Offender Registration Act Hear- ing on January 11, 2018, held before the Honorable Ruth Pickholz, Mr. Epstein's application was (firmly) denied, principally because it had been established by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders. See Peopl

l Campion Miller, Michael Gerard Scavelli, Reid Weingarten, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Marc Allan Fernich, Law

decision of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders and achieve a downward modification of Mr. Epstein's sex offender status. Id. at 2-15. Judge Pickholz appeared to be stunned by the joint Defense Counsel/District Attor- ney application, stating: "I am just a little overwhelmed that the People are m

llowed Mr. Epstein to avoid his reporting obligations. In a Sex Offender Registration Act Hear- ing on January 11, 2018, held before the Honorable Ruth Pickholz, Mr. Epstein's application was (firmly) denied, principally because it had been established by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders. See Peopl