Epstein Secrets

093961 Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Several typos omissions corrected below Judge Ramos: SEC 1 Off's Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Honig 18 Civ. 8175 (ER) I Casetext Search + Citator Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Honig, 18 Civ. 8175 (ER) I Casetext

A00093978 Further: WHY would the DFC consider "loaning" $765 million to KODK with NO EXISTING API capability when it already granted LESS money to Phlow/Ampac with proven capabilities? Answer: KODK liquidity issues are SEVERE Like Milken: Insider trading is NOT the real issue here. The latest BX orch

070295 Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Several typos omissions corrected below Judge Ramos: SEC 1 Off's Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Honig 18 Civ. 8175 (ER) I Casetext Search + Citator Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Honig, 18 Civ. 8175 (ER) I Casetext

A00070312 Further: WHY would the DFC consider "loaning" $765 million to KODK with NO EXISTING API capability when it already granted LESS money to Phlow/Ampac with proven capabilities? Answer: KODK liquidity issues are SEVERE Like Milken: Insider trading is NOT the real issue here. The latest BX orch

069802 Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Several typos omissions corrected below Judge Ramos: SEC 1 Off's Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Honig 18 Civ. 8175 (ER) I Casetext Search + Citator Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Honig, 18 Civ. 8175 (ER) I Casetext

A00069819 Further: WHY would the DFC consider "loaning" $765 million to KODK with NO EXISTING API capability when it already granted LESS money to Phlow/Ampac with proven capabilities? Answer: KODK liquidity issues are SEVERE Like Milken: Insider trading is NOT the real issue here. The latest BX orch

072215 Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Several typos omissions corrected below Judge Ramos: SEC 1 Off's Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Honig 18 Civ. 8175 (ER) I Casetext Search + Citator Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Honig, 18 Civ. 8175 (ER) I Casetext

A00072232 Further: WHY would the DFC consider "loaning" $765 million to KODK with NO EXISTING API capability when it already granted LESS money to Phlow/Ampac with proven capabilities? Answer: KODK liquidity issues are SEVERE Like Milken: Insider trading is NOT the real issue here. The latest BX orch

069504 Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Several typos omissions corrected below Judge Ramos: SEC 1 Off's Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Honig 18 Civ. 8175 (ER) I Casetext Search + Citator Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Honig, 18 Civ. 8175 (ER) I Casetext

A00069521 Further: WHY would the DFC consider "loaning" $765 million to KODK with NO EXISTING API capability when it already granted LESS money to Phlow/Ampac with proven capabilities? Answer: KODK liquidity issues are SEVERE Like Milken: Insider trading is NOT the real issue here. The latest BX orch

071365 Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Several typos omissions corrected below Judge Ramos: SEC 1 Off's Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Honig 18 Civ. 8175 (ER) I Casetext Search + Citator Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Honig, 18 Civ. 8175 (ER) I Casetext

A00071382 Further: WHY would the DFC consider "loaning" $765 million to KODK with NO EXISTING API capability when it already granted LESS money to Phlow/Ampac with proven capabilities? Answer: KODK liquidity issues are SEVERE Like Milken: Insider trading is NOT the real issue here. The latest BX orch

5 5 Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Several typos omissions corrected below Judge Ramos: SEC 1 Off's Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Honig 18 Civ. 8175 (ER) I Casetext Search + Citator Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Honig, 18 Civ. 8175 (ER) I Casetext

A00091178 Further: WHY would the DFC consider "loaning" $765 million to KODK with NO EXISTING API capability when it already granted LESS money to Phlow/Ampac with proven capabilities? Answer: KODK liquidity issues are SEVERE Like Milken: Insider trading is NOT the real issue here. The latest BX orch

070754 Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Several typos omissions corrected below Judge Ramos: SEC 1 Off's Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Honig 18 Civ. 8175 (ER) I Casetext Search + Citator Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Honig, 18 Civ. 8175 (ER) I Casetext

A00070771 Further: WHY would the DFC consider "loaning" $765 million to KODK with NO EXISTING API capability when it already granted LESS money to Phlow/Ampac with proven capabilities? Answer: KODK liquidity issues are SEVERE Like Milken: Insider trading is NOT the real issue here. The latest BX orch

067968 Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Several typos omissions corrected below Judge Ramos: SEC 1 Off's Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Honig 18 Civ. 8175 (ER) I Casetext Search + Citator Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Honig, 18 Civ. 8175 (ER) I Casetext

A00067985 Further: WHY would the DFC consider "loaning" $765 million to KODK with NO EXISTING API capability when it already granted LESS money to Phlow/Ampac with proven capabilities? Answer: KODK liquidity issues are SEVERE Like Milken: Insider trading is NOT the real issue here. The latest BX orch

actively facilitated by a grossly corrupt SEC. "1 off's" is how this is kept up and running. SEC Fraud on the SDNY/NY Supreme Court as well. Judge Ramos, Silver et al: there isn't enough time on your dockets for the next 5 years AT LEAST to keep up with this SEC facilitated fraud. Exactly the plan.

A00072307 Further: WHY would the DFC consider "loaning" $765 million to KODK with NO EXISTING API capability when it already granted LESS money to Phlow/Ampac with proven capabilities? Answer: KODK liquidity issues are SEVERE Like Milken: Insider trading is NOT the real issue here. The latest BX orch