Epstein Secrets

The dynamics of these "consenting" victim patterns of behavior can be explained to the court by an education expert witness as in United States v. Romero (7th Cir. 1999). The ability to make these explanations, however, is being undermined by the fact that children, at an age when they cannot legally

with minimal excuses . ■ recognition of the harm of the criminal behavior with minimal evidence of attempts to rationalize and validate it (e.g. , NAMBLA material, claims he helped children) ■ consequences for offending—some punishment is doing the defendant a favor and helping his treatment CHILD

sary an expert could be used to educate the court concerning certain pat- terns of behavior. The use of such an expert was upheld in United States v. Romero, 189 F.3d, 576 (7" Cir. 1999). 30 - CHILD MOLESTERS: A BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS EFTA01728659 Problem Areas In applying any typology the law-enforcem

rnalia and props (e.g., restraining devices, dolls, adult-sized baby clothing); a support network (e.g., North American Man/Boy Love Association or NAMBLA, Diaper Pail Fraternity Internet newsgroups and that rooms); and a body of literature (e.g., pornography, newsletters). In fact the paraphilias are

gary, an expert could be used to educate the court concerning certain patterns of behavior. The use of such an expert was upheld in United States v. Romero, 189 F.3d 576 (7* Cir. 1999). Prosecutors should be aware of a "Cautionary Statement" that appears on page =Evil of the DSM-IV-TR and reads in part

alia and props (e.g., restraining devices, gags, adult size baby clothing), 3) a support network (e.g., North American► Man/Boy Love Association or NAMBLA, Diaper Pail Fraternity), and 4) a body of literature (i.e., pornography). In fact, the paraphilias are the organizational framework or the "Dewey D