Epstein Secrets

ight? I would be very interested in reading the responses of linguists and computational language modelers to this. May I forward it to a friend at Google X? Some notes: > basic assumptions about human language that should I think be uncontroversial, extensively discussed elsewhere, then turning to a s

n of some form of symbolic behavior appears at about 75kya. Not long after that, we have rich evidence of quite extraordinary creative achievements (Lascaux, etc.). This is consistent with another observation: Modem humans had a population bottleneck of 2000-3000 individuals ca 75000 years ago, which co

ight? I would be very interested =n reading the responses of linguists and computational language =odelers to this. May I forward it to a friend at Google X? Some notes: > basic assumptions about human language that should I think be =ncontroversial, extensively discussed elsewhere, then turning to a =

n of some form of symbolic =ehavior appears at about 75kya. Not long after that, we have rich =vidence of quite extraordinary creative achievements (Lascaux, etc.). This is consistent with another observation: Modern humans had a =opulation bottleneck of 2000-3000 individuals ca 75000 years ago, which =

ight? I would be very interested =n reading the responses of linguists and computational language =odelers to this. May I forward it to a friend at Google X? Some notes: > basic assumptions about human language that should I think be =ncontroversial, extensively discussed elsewhere, then turning to a =

n of some form of symbolic =ehavior appears at about 75kya. Not long after that, we have rich =vidence of quite extraordinary creative achievements (Lascaux, etc.). This is consistent with another observation: Modern humans had a =opulation bottleneck of 2000-3000 individuals ca 75000 years ago, which =

ight? I would be very interes=ed in reading the responses of linguists and computational language modele=s to this. May I forward it to a friend at Google X? Some notes: > basic assumptions about human language that should I think be uncontro=ersial, extensively discussed elsewhere, then turning to a s

n of some form of symbolic behav=or appears at about 75kya. Not long after that, we have rich evidenc= of quite extraordinary creative achievements (Lascaux, etc.). This is consistent with another observation: Modern humans had a population=bottleneck of 2000-3000 individuals ca 75000 years ago, which c