Epstein Secrets

ent Record Bureau of the New Mexico Department of Public Safety, which states that Mr. Epstein "is not required to register [as a sex offender] with the State of New Mexico at this time for [his) 2008 Florida conviction of Procuring [a] Person Under 18 for Prostitution." Dkt. 25, Ex. A. The Court requested from the Def

comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight

ent Record Bureau of the New Mexico Department of Public Safety, which states that Mr. Epstein "is not required to register [as a sex offender] with the State of New Mexico at this time for [his) 2008 Florida conviction of Procuring [a] Person Under 18 for Prostitution." Dkt. 25, Ex. A. The Court requested from the Def

comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight

ent Record Bureau of the New Mexico Department of Public Safety, which states that Mr. Epstein "is not required to register [as a sex offender] with the State of New Mexico at this time for [his] 2008 Florida conviction of Procuring [a] Person Under 18 for Prostitution." Dkt. 25, Ex. A. The Court requested from the Def

comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight

ent Record Bureau of the New Mexico Department of Public Safety, which states that Mr. Epstein "is not required to register [as a sex offender] with the State of New Mexico at this time for [his) 2008 Florida conviction of Procuring [a] Person Under 18 for Prostitution." Dkt. 25, Ex. A. The Court requested from the Def

comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight